Skip to main content

Table 2 Sociodemographic and delivery characteristics by FGM type

From: Episiotomy and obstetric outcomes among women living with type 3 female genital mutilation: a secondary analysis

 

Full sample (n = 26,640)

No FGM (n = 6,696)

Type 3 FGM (n = 6,187)

Other FGM (n = 13,591)

FGM status (%)

24.0

25.2

23.4

51.3

Episiotomy (%)a, b

 None

57.3

71.1

13.8

70.4

 Anterior

6.9

2.5

18.0

4.0

 Posterior Lateral

21.5

25.4

12.3

23.7

 Anterior and Posterior

13.6

0.6

54.5

1.3

 Other

0.7

0.4

1.2

0.6

Age (mean) a, b

26.3

25.1

27.1

26.5

Urban Residence a, b

62.7

59.3

71.9

60.3

Education (%) a, b

 No education

31.8

34.3

16.6

37.5

 Non-formal

8.0

5.6

4.0

11.0

 Primary

26.7

32.2

26.6

24.1

 Secondary

25.0

23.1

38.4

19.9

 Tertiary

8.4

4.8

14.4

7.5

Socioeconomic status (%)a, b

 Low

35.6

38.2

16.7

42.8

 Medium

61.0

58.8

79.6

53.7

 High

3.4

3.0

3.7

3.5

Country (%) a, b

 Burkina Faso

17.0

13.2

9.3

22.5

 Ghana

10.9

25.7

0.5

8.4

 Kenya

18.9

8.9

0.6

31.9

 Nigeria

14.6

23.3

6.4

14.1

 Senegal

12.5

10.2

0.4

18.4

 Sudan

26.5

18.7

82.7

4.8

Any Previous Births (%) a

64.1

60.1

65.0

65.7

Pelvic introitus width a, b (mean fingerbreadths)

2.46

2.58

2.39

2.49

Anal sphincter tear (3rd or 4th Degree) (%)a, b

7.5

8.6

1.9

9.5

Intrapartum Blood Loss (requiring intervention) (%) a, b

1.4

1.4

0.6

1.7

Postpartum haemorrhage (%)a, b

6.2

4.8

3.4

8.2

  1. a Type 3 statistically different from No FGM; b Type 3 statistically different from other FGM types