Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of FGDs and IDIs and profile of participants

From: To what extent did implementing a community-embedded intervention align with the goals and roles of stakeholders in adolescent sexual and reproductive health?

Description of participants

Number of interviews

Number of participants

Gender

Male

Female

In-depth interviews (N = 30)

    

Policymakers and partners

 State Ministry of Health

3

3

–

3

 State Ministry of Education

1

1

–

1

 State Ministry of Information

1

1

–

1

 Legislator

1

1

1

–

 State Ministry of youth and sports development

1

1

1

–

 Primary Health Care Development (SPHCDA)

1

1

–

1

 Media (EBBC)

2

2

1

1

 SDGs

1

1

–

1

 NGO

1

1

–

1

 CSO

I

1

1

–

Community leaders

 Traditional rulers

2

2

2

–

 Religious leader

1

1

1

–

Health service providers/supervisors and teachers

 LGA ASRH focal officers

6

6

1

5

 LGA admin secs

2

2

–

2

 Teachers/Principals/GC

6

6

2

4

Focus Group Discussions (10 groups)

 PHC workers (OICs)

2

7/7

7

7

 PMVs

2

6/6

4

8

 CHWs

2

7/6

6

7

Parents, community leaders

 Male parents

1

6

6

–

 Female parents

1

6

–

6

 Male community leaders

1

6

6

–

 Female community leaders

1

6

–

6

 Total

40

93

39

54