Skip to main content

Table 2 Bivariate analysis of individual, household and community effects on generational continuation of FGM

From: Contextual determinants of generational continuation of female genital mutilation among women of reproductive age in nigeria: analysis of the 2018 demographic and health survey

Individual factors

% with continued FGM

Individual Factors (model 2)

Household Factors (model 3)

Community Factors (model 4)

uaOR (95% C.I)

uaOR (95% C.I)

uaOR (95% C.I)

Age

15–24

42.8

0.40 (0.28–0.57)a

  

25–34

44.9

1.05 (0.83–1.33)

  

35–49

35.4

0b

  

Years of Education

 

0.99 (0.96–1.02)

  

Religion

Christianity

22.7

0.61 (0.45–0.84)a

  

Islam

53.0

0b

  

Ethnicity

Yoruba

23.5

0b

  

Hausa

63.7

3.84 (2.76–5.34)a

  

Igbo

25.4

1.04 (0.75–1.45)

  

Others

23.1

0.90 (0.64–1.28)

  

Personal support for FGM

Yes

35.1

1.08 (1.03- 1.13)a

  

No

16.7

0b

  

Level of exposure to Media

 

0.99 (0.98–1.00)

  

Household factors

 Wealth status

Poor

54.2

 

0b

 

Middle

43.4

 

0.67 (0.51–0.88)a

 

Rich

27.1

 

0.44 (0.35–0.56)a

 

 Female household headship

Yes

31.2

 

0.93 (0.69–1.25)

 

No

40.9

 

0b

 

 Female involvement in household decision

Yes

39.4

 

0.86 (0.81–0.91)a

 

No

43.3

 

0b

 

Community factors

 Zone

North Central

37.7

  

1.42 (0.91–2.23)

North East

59.8

  

3.54 (1.72–7.26)a

North West

64.3

  

3.57 (1.80–7.06)a

South East

25.9

  

1.27 (0.73–2.23)

South South

14.9

  

0.67 (0.40–1.11)

South West

20.5

  

0b

 Residence

Urban

29.8

  

0.84 (0.65–1.08)

 

Rural

51.2

  

0b

 Proportion of Yoruba

High

26.5

  

0b

Low

47.7

  

1.59 (1.02–2.48)a

 Proportion of Igbo

High

24.1

  

1.10 (0.79–1.53)

Low

49.6

  

0b

 Proportion of Hausa

High

63.3

  

1.82 (1.03–3.21)a

Low

22.3

  

0b

 Proportion of the poor in the communities

Low

25.2

  

0b

Moderate

42.2

  

1.41 (0.92–2.16)

High

55.5

  

1.38 (1.01–1.88)a

 Proportion of uneducated mothers

Low

23.8

  

1.18 (0.63–2.20)

Moderate

29.3

  

0.63 (0.44–0.90)a

High

63.3

  

0b

 Proportion of uneducated partners

Low

23.6

  

0b

Moderate

29.9

  

1.02 (0.72–1.43)

High

61.7

  

1.35 (0.79–2.33)

 Proportion unexposed to media

Low

20.9

  

0b

Moderate

46.9

  

1.96 (1.43–2.70)a

High

59.4

  

1.44 (0.91–2.26)

 Proportion of women participants in household decision

Low

48.1

  

0b

Moderate

45.7

  

1.11 (0.83–1.50)

High

30.6

  

1.21 (0.88–1.66)

 Proportion of community women who supported FGM

Low

42.2

  

0b

Moderate

37.2

  

1.73 (1.57–1.92)a

High

33.3

  

1.75 (0.50–1.82)

  1. asignificant at 5%; uaOR  unadjusted odds ratio, CI  confidence interval; b. is set at zero for the reference category