Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies and their assessment of exposure

From: The effects of pregnancy intention on the use of antenatal care services: systematic review and meta-analysis

No

Author

Country

Design

Sample

Exposure assessment

Response rate

Confounders adjusted

1

Cheng, 2009

USA

CS

9048 women

2 - 9 months postpartum

71%

Maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, Medicaid status and parity.

2

Eggleston, 2000

Ecuador

CS

3988 women

Women with a pregnancy in the 2 years before the survey interviewed

96.4%

Age, SES, residence, education, number of previous pregnancies

3

Bassani, 2009

Brazil

CS

611 women

Postpartum period

100%

Age, income, education, skin color, parity, satisfaction with pregnancy

4

Magadi, 2000

Kenya

CS

6115 women

Five years prior to the survey

NR

Region/ethnicity, work status, SES, birth order, use of family planning

5

Marston, 2003

5 DHS countries

CS

45,121 women (5 countries)

Five years prior to the survey

NR

Birth order, education, wealth, place of residence

6

Pagnini, 2000

USA

CS

91,585 women

Medical records of women

NR

Race, age, year, psychosocial and behavioral variables

7

Haghpeykar, 2005

USA

CS

300 women

Interviewed during pregnancy

90%

Age, education, income, previous pregnancies, marital status

8

Rodrı’guez, 1997

Spain

CS

409 women

Women admitted for delivery

100%

Social class, education, previous pregnancy, occupation

9

Raghupathy, 1997

Thailand

CS

2754

Women with a birth in the 5 years before the survey

NR

Education, age of mother, income, religion, birth order

10

Braveman,

USA

CS

3071 women

Interviewed during delivery stays in Hospitals

NR

Income, age, education, birth order, race/ethnicity, medical coverage

11

Hulsey, 2000

USA

Historical cohort

1,989 women

Interview as part of cycle V of NSFG

NR

Age, ethnicity, parity, marital status, income, education, employment

12

Marsiglio, 1988

USA

Prospective panel

6,286 women

Interview annually from 1979 - 1988

95.7%

Age, race, residence, education

13

D’Angelo, 2004

USA

CS

25,027 women

Women interviewed for the 1998 PRAMS

NR

Age, marital status, education, race, parity, Medicaid coverage,

14

Waller,

USA

CS

4,898 women

Women and their partners interviewed

83%

Child sex, parental education, parent’s age, parental race/ethnicity, fertility history

15

Biratu, 2000

Ethiopia

CS

1,750 women

Women with a live birth in 12 months before the survey date

100%

Education, age, ethnicity, religion, parity, union type and husband approval

16

Joyce, 2000

USA

CS

4415 women

Late PNC

91%

Child’s sex, mother’s education, region, residence, race/ethnicity

17

Gage, 1998

Kenya & Nambia

CS

6052 & 3877

Women with a birth in the 5 years before the survey

NR

Education, residence, distance to the nearest health facility , ethnicity

18

Hohmann-Marriott

New Zealand

CS

5788

Interview as 1st round of Longitudinal data

NR

Age, education, race/ethnicity, SES, parity and twin status

19

Tariku, 2010

Ethiopia

CS

630 women

Interview during prenatal care

97.1%

Education, parity, means of confirming pregnancy, previous ANC

20

Orr, 2008

USA

CS

913 women

Interview after child birth

NR

Age, education, race/ethnicity, SES, parity

21

Mayor, 1997

USA

Cohort

2032 women

Questionnaire to women who delivered in a facility

70%

Maternal age, education, parity, race, and insurance status

22

Sable , 1998

USA

Case control

2,828 women

3 months postpartum

75%

Maternal age, race, education, Medicaid eligibility, marital status

23

Altfeld, 1998

USA

Cohort

380 women

Interview during pregnancy & Postpartum

99%

Age, race, education, Medicaid, marital status

24

Barrick, 2008

India

Cohort study

3666 women

Interview before conception & after child birth

81.1%

Age, parity, education, asset ownership, autonomy

25

Humbert, 2010

USA

CS

478 women

Interviewed during Postpartum Hospital visit

NR

Age, race, ethnicity, marital status, and parity

26

Weller, 1987

USA

CS/OBS

7,825 women

Women with a live birth in 1980 interviewed

NR

Maternal race residence, and education

27

Behailu, 2009

Ethiopia

CS

620 women

Women who had alive birth in the last year Interviewed

96%

Age, education, residence, ethnicity, marital status

28

Martin, 2007

USA

CS

5404 women & partners

Interview with women and their partners

76.1%

Maternal education, race/ethnicity, marital status, age at birth, household income, employment

29

Potter, 2009

USA

prospective

667 women

Interview with women in prenatal care

NR

Age, race, education, social support and perceived health status

30

Jeffery, 1997

USA

CS

2032

Interview with women coming to delivery

NR

Education, marital status, race, parity

31

Abosie Z., 2009

Ethiopia

CS

691

Women with birth in last 5 years interviewed

97.3%

Parity, number of pregnancies, experience of abortion, still birth , distance from health facility

32

Fenta M., 2005

Ethiopia

CS

642

Women with births in the 12 months before survey

100%

Age, education, ethnicity, marital status, religion, family size

  1. Cs = cross-sectional study.