Skip to main content

Table 3 Multinomial regression analysis of respondent’s family planning practices (N = 300)

From: Effect of gender preference on fertility: cross-sectional study among women of Tharu community from rural area of eastern region of Nepal

Current use of contraceptives

Independent variables

Unadjusted OR

CI

Adjusted OR

CI

Temporary contraceptives

Age

15–24

4.073**

2.072–8.005

3.656*

1.452–9.208

25–34

3.050**

1.667–5.580

2.837*

1.374–5.860

35–49R

    

Education of the respondents

Illiterate

0.385*

0.189–0.785

0.875

.356–2.149

Primary

0.557

0.309–1.005

0.677

.350–1.312

SecondaryR

    

No. of children

1

2.988*

1.440–6.198

2.148

0.655–7.042

2

1.668

0.794–3.504

1.330

0.586–3.017

≥3R

    

Sex of last child

Female

0.738

0.449–1.213

0.833

0.377–1.843

MaleR

    

Sex composition

Only male

1.478

0.803–2.722

0.519

0.190–1.420

Only female

0.976

0.541–1.761

0.443

0.170–1.159

bothR

    

Permanent contraceptives

Age

15–24

0.143*

0.032–0.643

0.411

0.066–2.540

25–34

0.412*

0.184–0.921

0.473

0.185–1.214

35–49R

    

Education of the respondents

Illiterate

0.988

0.372–2.625

0.173*

0.048–0.621

Primary

1.219

0.520–2.858

0.289*

0.097–0.854

SecondaryR

    

No. of children

1

0.104**

0.028–0.384

0.046**

0.007–0.294

2

0.808

0.384–1.699

0.564

0.237–1.342

3R

    

Sex of last child

Female

0.375*

0.186–0.758

0.416

0.152–1.140

MaleR

    

Sex composition

Only male

0.946

0.438–2.045

2.593

0.898–7.489

Only female

0.277*

0.105–0.732

1.073

0.315–3.655

  

BothR

    
  1. *Significance p < 0.05, **Significance p < 0.001, the reference category is No use of contraceptives.
  2. R = Reference.
  3. It was found that model of fit is significant-2 log likelihood = 214.818 χ2 (18) = 86.980, p < .001, which indicates this model predicts significantly better, or more accurately.