Table 6 Multinomial logistic regressions of gender measures and current contraceptive method mix among men (modern method users) in four study cities, Uttar Pradesh, India, 2010
From: Men’s attitudes on gender equality and their contraceptive use in Uttar Pradesh India
Variables in equation | Condom vs. sterilization (Ref.) β (SE) | Other modern methods vs. sterilization (Ref.) β (SE) | Condom vs. other modern methods (Ref.) β (SE) |
|---|---|---|---|
Gender sensitive decision making –Unadjusted – Model 1 | |||
Gender sensitive decision making (GSDM) | |||
Highly sensitive | 0.44 (0.09)*** | 0.11 (0.16) | 0.33 (0.15)* |
Moderately sensitive | 0.29 (0.10)** | 0.68 (0.16)*** | −0.39 (0.15)* |
Less sensitive (Ref.) | |||
Gender sensitive decision making - Adjusted for Demographics† − Model 2 | |||
Gender sensitive decision making (GSDM) | |||
Highly sensitive | 0.36 (0.11)* | 0.09 (0.17) | 0.26 (0.16)+ |
Moderately sensitive | 0.18 (0.11) | 0.65 (0.17)*** | −0.47 (0.16)** |
Less sensitive (Ref.) | |||
Restrictions on Wife’s Mobility–Unadjusted – Model 1 | |||
Restrictions on wife’s mobility | |||
Less restrictive | −0.55 (0.10)*** | −0.78 (0.15)*** | 0.22 (0.14) |
Moderately restrictive | −0.50 (0.11)*** | −0.75 (0.16)*** | 0.25 (0.15) |
Highly restrictive (Ref.) | |||
Restrictions on Wife’s Mobility - Adjusted for Demographics† − Model 2 | |||
Restrictions on wife’s mobility | |||
Less restrictive | −0.43 (0.12)*** | −0.60 (0.16)*** | 0.17 (0.14) |
Moderately restrictive | −0.49 (0.13)** | −0.74 (0.18)*** | 0.26 (0.15) |
Highly restrictive (Ref.) | |||
Gender Equal Attitude Scale –Unadjusted – Model 1 | |||
Gender equal attitude scale | |||
High gender equal attitude | 0.63 (0.15)*** | 0.51 (0.25)* | 0.12 (0.24) |
Moderate gender equal attitude | 0.46 (0.15)** | 0.34 (0.24) | 0.13 (0.24) |
Less gender equal attitude (Ref.) | |||
Gender Equal Attitude Scale - Adjusted for Demographics† − Model 2 | |||
Gender equal attitude scale | |||
High gender equal attitude | 0.08 (0.20) | 0.24 (0.27) | −0.17 (0.26) |
Moderate gender equal attitude | 0.20 (0.16) | 0.21 (0.26) | −0.01 (0.25) |
Less gender equal attitude (Ref.) | |||
All Gender Measures – Adjusted for Demographics† and other Gender Measures – Model 3 | |||
Gender sensitive decision making (GSDM) | |||
Highly sensitive | 0.41 (0.11)*** | 0.10 (0.17) | 0.31 (0.16)* |
Moderately sensitive | 0.20 (0.12)+ | 0.70 (0.17)*** | −0.50 (0.16)** |
Less sensitive (Ref.) | |||
Restrictions on wife | |||
Less restrictive | −0.42 (0.12)*** | −0.54 (0.17)*** | 0.11 (0.15) |
Moderately restrictive | −0.49 (0.13)*** | −0.75 (0.18)*** | 0.26 (0.16) |
Highly restrictive (Ref.) | |||
GE gender equal attitude scale | |||
High gender equal attitude | 0.08 (0.18) | 0.20 (0.27) | −0.12 (0.26) |
Moderate gender equal attitude | 0.26 (0.17) | 0.10 (0.26) | −0.16 (0.25) |
Less gender equal attitude (Ref.) | |||