Skip to main content

Table 1 PICOS elements of the review protoco

From: Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): Evaluation of evidence to support public policy development

Parameter

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

P articipants

• Couples 18 years of age and older with infertility

 

I nterventions

• IVF/ICSI

• GIFT/ZIFT

 

• In vitro maturation

C omparators

• Spontaneous/natural conception

Studies comparing different drugs or drug regimens used

• Less invasive ARTs (ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination)

• Studies assessing pre-treatment characteristics, such as embryo and uterine preparation techniques or hysteroscopy, or treatment ‘add-ons’, such as preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) or assisted hatching (AH)

• Procedural differences, including:

 

- the number of embryo’s transferred

 

- blastocyst vs. cleavage embryo transfers

 

- frozen vs. fresh embryo transfers

 

- autologous vs. donor embryo transfers

 

O utcomes

Safety:

• Studies without any defined clinical outcomes

• Neonatal/infant complications (e.g., ectopic pregnancy, low birth weight, neonatal/perinatal mortality, birth defects, congenital malformations)

 

• Pregnancy and delivery complications (e.g., OHSS, ectopic pregnancy, preeclampsia, caesarean delivery, preterm birth)

 

Effectiveness:

 

• Indicators of cycle success (e.g., number of oocytes retrieved, cycle cancellation, implantation)

 

• Pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth

 

• Multiple pregnancy/multiple birth

 

S tudy design

• Systematic reviews

Primary studies*

  1. *Primary studies will be included if evidence gaps are identified after review of systematic reviews.