Table 4 Reason and final decision making regarding insertion of IUCD/Implant by prospective client follow-up group
Indicators | Telephone group | Physical group | Passive group |
|---|---|---|---|
N = 424 | N = 409 | N = 428 | |
% | % | % | |
Reason for choosing IUCD/Implant | |||
Suggested by FHE (Suraj) | 7.9 | 8.3 | 9.6 |
Suggested by FHE (Urban) | 7.4 | 8.8 | 8.2 |
Suggested by Suraj client | 4.1 | 4.6 | 1.6 |
Long acting effectiveness | 61.3 | 59.2 | 55.3 |
Freely available | 7.2 | 7.6 | 7.7 |
Easily accessible | 8.6 | 7.3 | 13.1 |
Others (fewer side effects, suggested by husband/LHW/Urban happy client) | 3.5 | 4.1 | 4.4 |
P-value | 0.14 | ||
Final decision made by | |||
Myself | 57.5 | 62.3 | 64.6 |
Husband | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Both (husband & wife) | 36.3 | 32.8 | 32.8 |
Mother in law | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
All together | 3.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
P-value | 0.08 | ||
Experienced side effects during IUCD/Implant insertion | |||
Yes | 21.9 | 24.4 | 21.5 |
No | 78.1 | 75.6 | 78.5 |
P-value | 0.71 | ||
Got the painkillers to take home | |||
Yes | 32.9 | 38.4 | 32.6 |
No | 67.1 | 61.7 | 67.4 |
P-value | 0.35 | ||