Skip to content


Reproductive Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

WHO Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD) project: innovating to improve quality of care around the time of childbirth

  • Olufemi T Oladapo1Email author,
  • João Paulo Souza2,
  • Meghan A Bohren1, 3,
  • Özge Tunçalp1,
  • Joshua P Vogel1,
  • Bukola Fawole4,
  • Kidza Mugerwa5 and
  • A Metin Gülmezoglu1
Reproductive Health201512:48

Received: 9 April 2015

Accepted: 14 April 2015

Published: 26 May 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
9 Apr 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Apr 2015 Editorially accepted
26 May 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12978-015-0027-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirao Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda