Formative research component | Key findings | Implication for intervention design |
---|---|---|
Insights from contraception literature | • Health concerns identified as major reason for non-use. Other reasons include factors related to access, cost, autonomy | • Intervention needs to address health concerns as well as factors related to access, cost (by nforming clients where they can access contraception near their home) and autonomy |
 | • Limited evidence for interventions to improve adherence to specific contraceptive methods or uptake of PAFP | • The intervention needs to anticipate some discontinuation and aim to facilitate safe method switching and well as support continuation with existing method |
 | • Most discontinuation occurs within the first few months | • Decided to provide intervention for three-months |
Insights from mHealth intervention and behaviour change literature | •Uni-facteted* adherence interventions have at best modest effects | • Developed a multi-faceted intervention providing information reminders and support to boost motivation to use PAFP |
 | • A semi-automated mHealth intervention increased adherence to HIV treatment in Kenya | • A similar intervention could be adapted for PAFP in Cambodia |
Case note review | • 40 % uptake of effective PAFP at the time of seeking abortion services | • An mHealth intervention is an opportunity to maintain contact with clients that don’t return to the clinic for contraception after seeking abortion services |
•Over 50 % clients did not return to the clinic within 12-months | ||
Interviews | • Side-effects with contraception common | • Re-enforced findings from literature that intervention should address health concerns |
 | • Clients can find it difficult to make decisions about PAFP at time of seeking abortion services | • The mHealth intervention is an opportunity to maintain contact and remind clients about available methods |
 | • Women sometimes have to discuss with their husband/partner before using contraception | • Re-enforced findings from literature review that the intervention take into account women’s lack of autonomy, facilitating a discussion with husband/partner if appropriate |
Focus group discussions | • Preference for voice rather than text-based intervention | • Intervention used voice messages sent to clients phone instead of text-messages |
 | • Many clients preferred direct phone call to automated message | • Developed a semi-automated intervention as fully counsellor delivered intervention would be costly to scale up |
 | • Clients preferred that the messages mentioned the terms ‘Marie Stopes’ and ‘contraception’ | • Voice message mentioned ‘contraception’ and ‘Marie Stopes’, but not the name of the client |
Consultation with MSIC staff and other organisations | • Text-message interventions likely to have limited success in Cambodia | • Re-enforced findings from clients that intervention should use voice rather than text |
 | • A fully counsellor delivered intervention would be costly and hence harder to scale-up | • Intervention was semi-automated aiming to identify clients most in need of additional support |