Skip to main content

Table 3 Demographic characteristics of women with type 3 FGM by type of episiotomy

From: Episiotomy and obstetric outcomes among women living with type 3 female genital mutilation: a secondary analysis

 

No episiotomy

Anterior

Posterior lateral

Anterior & posterior

Other

(n = 857)

(n = 1115)

(n = 763)

(n = 3377)

(n = 75)

Age (mean)

27.4

30.1a

24.9a

26.6a

21.8a

Urban Residence

67.6

76.1a

68.0

72.4a

76.0

Education (%)

 No education

39.0

18.0a

22.5a

9.0a

24.0

 Non-formal

9.1

2.3

7.0

1.8

41.3

 Primary

22.7

32.1

24.4

26.1

28.0

 Secondary

21.7

41.1

35.0

43.3

4.0

 Tertiary

7.5

6.5

11.1

19.8

2.7

Socioeconomic status (%)

 Low

37.9

14.1a

28.2a

9.0a

38.7

 Medium

59.2

83.1

66.6

87.0

61.3

 High

2.9

2.8

5.2

4.0

0.0

Country (%)

 Burkina Faso

31.5

5.9a

26.9a

0.8a

5.3a

 Ghana

2.7

0.0

0.8

0.1

0.0

 Kenya

2.7

0.4

0.9

0.2

1.3

 Nigeria

22.5

0.8

11.3

1.3

90.1

 Senegal

1.4

0.0

1.8

0.0

0.0

 Sudan

39.2

92.9

58.3

97.7

2.7

Any Previous Births (%)

72.7

91.7a

53.0a

57.4a

42.7a

  1. aStatistically different from “no episiotomy”