Table 2 Test results for the twenty condom brands
From: Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011
ANALYZED SAMPLE | Dimensions (length, width, thickness) | Freedom from holes | Package integrity | Volumetric capacity and burst pressure | Packaging and labeling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | |||||
D2 | NC | ||||
C3 | NC | ||||
A4 | NC | ||||
F5 | NC | NC | |||
G6 | NC | ||||
H7 | NC | ||||
H8 | NC | ||||
B9 | NC | NC | |||
D10 | |||||
D11 | NC | ||||
B12 | NC | ||||
E13 | NC | ||||
E14 | NC | ||||
D15 | NC | ||||
A16 | NC | ||||
A17 | NC | ||||
A18 | NC | ||||
A19 | NC | ||||
D20 |