Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors associated with uptake of hormonal contraceptive methods in multivariable model

From: Uptake of hormonal contraceptives and correlates of uptake in a phase III clinical trial in rural South Western Uganda

Characteristic

N (col %)

Up take of Hormonal contraceptives n (row %)

uOR (95% CI)

LRT P-value

aOR (95% CI)

All participants

579

296 (51.1)

   

Age group in years

 31+

311 (53.7)

116/311 (37.3)

1

<0.001

1

 16 – 30

268 (46.3)

180/268 (67.2)

3.3 (2.4-4.7)

2.5 (1.7-3.6)

Religion*

 Christians

503 (86.9)

251/503 (49.9)

1

0.122

 

 Muslim

76 (13.1)

45/76 (59.2)

1.5 (0.9-2.4)

 

Level of education

 None

92 (15.9)

43/92 (46.7)

1

0.747

 

 Primary

390 (67.4)

204/390 (52.3)

1.2 (0.8-1.9)

 

 Secondary+

97 (16.7)

49/97 (50.5)

1.1 (0.6-2.0)

 

Employment status

 Employed full time

62 (10.7)

26/62 (41.9)

1

0.150

 

 Unemployed

440 (76.0)

225/440 (51.1)

1.5 (0.9-2.6)

 

 House wife

77 (13.3)

45/77 (58.4)

1.8 (0.9-3.5)

 

Contraceptive method at enrolment

 Condom

215 (37.1)

85/215 (39.5)

1

<0.001

 

 No method

334 (57.7)

204/334 (61.1)

2.4 (1.7-3.4)

 

 Other

30 (5.2)

7/30 (23.3)

0.5 (0.2-1.3)

 

Unreliable method of family planning used at baseline/reasons for non-use

 Use of unreliable method

245 (42.3)

92/245 (337.6)

1

<0.001

1

 Breast feeding

141 (24.4)

111/141 (78.7)

6.0 (3.7-9.7)

5.0 (3.1-8.1)

 Spent ≥2 years without getting pregnant

77 (13.3)

20/77 (26.0)

0.6 (0.3-1.1)

 

0.7 (0.4-1.2)

 Side effects/fear

60 (10.4)

30/60 (50.0)

1.5 (0.9-2.6)

 

1.4 (0.8-2.4)

 No access/money

31 (5.4)

25/31 (80.6)

7.2 (2.9-18.3)

 

6.8 (2.6-17.4)

 Other

25 (4.3)

18/25 (72.0)

4.5 (1.8-11.1)

 

4.2 (1.7-10.7)

  1. uOR unadjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, LRT likelihood ratio test, aOR adjusted odds ratio: factors adjusted for age, reasons for non-contraceptives use prior to enrolment, contraceptive use status at baseline, employment status and religion