Skip to main content

Table 3 MR, PAC and family planning service integration indicators at baseline and endline, overall and by facility type

From: Integrating postabortion care, menstrual regulation and family planning services in Bangladesh: a pre-post evaluation

 

DGFP facilities

DGHS facilities

Overall

 

Baseline

Endline

 

Baseline

Endline

 

Baseline

Endline

 
 

n

(%)

n

(%)

p-value

n

(%)

n

(%)

p-value

n

(%)

n

(%)

p-value

All Uterine Evacuation Clients

(n = 74)

(n = 48)

 

(n = 31)

(n = 59)

 

(n = 105)

(n = 107)

 

Uterine Evacuation Service Type

    

0.107

    

<0.001

    

0.656

 MR

64

(86.5)

36

(75.0)

 

0

(0)

26

(44.1)

 

64

(61.0)

62

(57.9)

 

 PAC

10

(13.5)

12

(25.0)

 

31

(100)

33

(55.9)

 

41

(39.0)

45

(42.1)

 

Provider Type

    

<0.001

    

0.005

    

<0.001

 Doctor

30

(42.3)

0

(0)

 

23

(82.1)

30

(50.9)

 

53

(53.5)

30

(28.6)

 

 Midlevel provider

41

(57.2)

46

(100)

 

5

(17.9)

29

(49.1)

 

46

(46.5)

75

(71.4)

 

Counseled on Post-abortion Family Planning

    

0.419

    

<0.001

    

0.830

 Yes

73

(98.7)

48

(100)

 

7

(22.6)

39

(66.1)

 

80

(76.2)

87

(81.3)

 

 No

1

(1.3)

0

(0)

 

24

(77.4)

20

(33.9)

 

25

(23.8)

20

(18.7)

 

Counseled on Post-abortion Family Planning

(n = 73)

(n = 48)

 

(n = 7)

(n = 39)

 

(n = 80)

(n = 87)

 

Accepted Post-abortion Family Planning

    

0.075

    

0.006

    

0.029

 Yes

45

(61.6)

37

(77.1)

 

1

(14.3)

27

(69.2)

 

46

(57.5)

64

(73.6)

 

 No

28

(38.4)

11

(22.9)

 

6

(85.7)

12

(30.8)

 

34

(42.5)

23

(26.4)

 

Type of Family Planning Method Accepted

    

0.039

    

0.010

    

0.122

 Short-acting method

36

(49.3)

23

(47.9)

 

1

(14.3)

26

(66.7)

 

37

(46.2)

49

(56.3)

 

 Long-acting method

9

(12.3)

14

(29.2)

 

0

(0)

0

(0)

 

9

(11.3)

14

(16.1)

 

 No method

28

(38.4)

11

(22.9)

 

6

(85.7)

13

(33.3)

 

34

(42.5)

24

(27.6)

 

Post-abortion Family Planning Not Accepted

(n = 28)

(n = 11)

 

(n = 6)

(n = 13)

 

(n = 34)

(n = 24)

 

Reason for Not Accepting a Method

    

0.036

    

0.051

    

0.009

 Did not want a method

2

(7.1)

0

(0)

 

3

(50.0)

1

(8.3)

 

5

(14.7)

1

(4.4)

 

 Not offered a method

1

(3.6)

1

(9.1)

 

0

(0)

2

(16.7)

 

1

(2.9)

3

(13.0)

 

 Did not have method she wanted

9

(32.1)

0

(0)

 

2

(33.3)

0

(0)

 

11

(32.4)

0

(0)

 

 Will accept a method later

8

(28.6)

9

(81.8)

 

1

(16.7)

4

(33.3)

 

9

(26.5)

13

(56.5)

 

 Have not decided on a method yet

5

(17.9)

0

(0)

 

0

(0)

2

(16.7)

 

5

(14.7)

2

(8.7)

 

 Other

3

(10.7)

1

(9.9)

 

0

(0)

3

(25.0)

 

3

(8.8)

4

(17.4)