Abortion debates in Finland and the Republic of Ireland: textual analysis of experiential thinking and argumentation in parliamentary and layperson discussions
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fran Amery|
|10 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fiona Bloomer|
|19 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sofia Larsson|
|20 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Petteri Nieminen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sofia Larsson|
|6 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fran Amery|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12978-017-0418-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.