Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Abortion debates in Finland and the Republic of Ireland: textual analysis of experiential thinking and argumentation in parliamentary and layperson discussions

Reproductive Health201714:163

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0418-y

Received: 15 June 2017

Accepted: 15 November 2017

Published: 2 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fran Amery
10 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fiona Bloomer
19 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sofia Larsson
20 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Petteri Nieminen
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sofia Larsson
6 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fran Amery
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
15 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12978-017-0418-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine/Anatomy, Kuopio, Finland
(2)
University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Science and Forestry, Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Joensuu, Finland
(3)
University of Eastern Finland, Philosophical Faculty, School of Theology, Joensuu, Finland

Advertisement