Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparative satisfaction of receiving medical abortion service from nurses and auxiliary nurse-midwives or doctors in Nepal: results of a randomized trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean-Paul Dossou
17 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John K. Ganle
26 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tamara Fetters
13 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anand Tamang
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean-Paul Dossou
26 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erin Pearson
1 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anand Tamang
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
5 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
16 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12978-017-0438-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement