Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effectiveness of health education as an intervention designed to prevent female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review

  • Susan Waigwa1Email author,
  • Lucy Doos2,
  • Caroline Bradbury-Jones1 and
  • Julie Taylor3
Reproductive Health201815:62

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0503-x

Received: 28 October 2017

Accepted: 2 April 2018

Published: 12 April 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beth Ahlberg
26 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Refaat Sadek
8 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Susan Waigwa
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Susan Waigwa
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
2 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
12 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12978-018-0503-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Nursing, College of Medical and Dental Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
(2)
School of Social policy, College of Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
(3)
School of Nursing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham and Birmingham Women’s and Children’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

Advertisement