Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of Women’s Referral Support and Knowledge by Referral Attendance Status

From: Factors influencing referrals for ultrasound-diagnosed complications during prenatal care in five low and middle income countries

Response

N (%)

 

Attended Referral

Did Not Attend Referral

p-value

Know other mothers that have had USa

452/510 (88.6)

164/190 (86.3)

0.9199

Baby’s father thinks she should have USa

486/509 (95.5)

183/190 (96.3)

0.6845

Other family members think she should have USa

492/509 (96.7)

179/190 (94.2)

0.0454*

Planned to attend referral visita

493/503 (98.0)

84/186 (45.2)

<.0001*

Told the date that she should go to referral hospitala

446/505 (88.3)

163/188 (86.7)

0.0299*

Told where in the hospital to visit firsta

476/505 (94.3)

154/188 (81.9)

0.0002*

Given a card that indicated she should go to the referral hospital, to show at hospitala

486/505 (96.2)

184/188 (97.9)

0.5759

Told who to see at the referral hospitala

444/505 (87.9)

122/186 (65.6)

<.0001*

Knew what the process would be once at the hospitala

316/503 (62.8)

115/185 (62.2)

0.0143*

Told that hospital is expecting her arrivala

344/502 (68.5)

103/185 (55.7)

0.0002*

  1. Abbreviation: US ultrasound
  2. aHypotheses test results: p-values calculated from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test (General Association statistic)
  3. *Denotes p-value < 0.05