Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate log-binomial regression analyses exploring predictors of women’s preference for clinician-collection versus self-collection of genital specimens

From: Preference of specimen collection methods for human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of high-risk women in Mombasa, Kenya

Variable

Overall Number (Percent) of women who prefer self-collection N = 199

Women who prefer clinician-collection n = 136

Women who prefer self-collection n = 63

Relative Risk (95% CI) for preference of clinician versus self-collection

p-value

Mean (SD) or Number (Percent)

Median (IQR) or Number (Percent)

Age (years)

 

38.2 (9.7)

36.4 (9.1)

0.99 (0.97–1.0)

0.25

Age at first sex (years)

 

16.6 (2.2)

17.4 (2.4)

1.10 (1.02–1.19)

0.02

Parity

 Nulliparous

44%

9 (7%)

7 (11%)

Reference

 

 Ever pregnant

31%

127 (93%)

56 (89%)

0.71 (0.39–1.28)

0.26

Education

 8 years and less

27%

79 (58%)

29 (46%)

Reference

 

v > 8 years

37%

57 (42%)

34 (54%)

1.39 (0.92–2.10)

0.11

Marital status

 Never married

30%

55 (40%)

24 (38%)

Reference

 

 Ever married

33%

81 (60%)

39 (62%)

1.07 (0.70–1.63)

0.75

HIV status

 HIV-negative

35%

64 (47%)

35 (56%)

Reference

 

 HIV-positive

28%

72 (53%)

28 (44%)

0.79 (0.52–1.20)

0.27

Religion

 Christian

 

122 (90%)

54 (86%)

Reference

 

 Muslim

 

18 (9)

8 (13%)

1.45 (0.83–2.54)

0.20

 Othera

 

5 (3)

1 (2%)

0.65 (0.11–3.82)

0.64

  1. aTraditional African religions and no religious affiliation