Form * form is data entered | Who completes form and when | Data management and when | Purpose of form | How are data reviewed and used |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screening, Recruitment, & Monitoring Sessions | ||||
 Recruitment and tracking log | Who: Field staff When: Each time a couple is contacted. Additionally, updated on a quarterly basis for as long as participants stay followed up. | Who: Field staff to collect data and enter into tables. They will review the data weekly to ensure recruitment numbers are reaching their goal, and recruitment rates are acceptable. PC will compile tables from field staff team leaders into the master excel file. When: During recruitment, weekly statistics on recruitment numbers and % of contacted couples recruited summarized. During follow-up, bi-weekly reports of contact attempts, contacts made and the current follow-up %. | To track recruitment rates, refusal rates and reasons for refusal. It will include detailed tracking information with contacts of in-laws, natal family, a neighbor on CommCare. Will also track the completion of each survey. For any loss to follow-up will track any known reason for loss to follow-up. | Reviewed by NIRRH/ PC weekly. Discussed with UCSD weekly, for recruitment numbers, and recruitment rates. |
 Training protocol (for intervention) | N/A | N/A | Training protocol for providers. Includes role play and scoring on role play. | N/A |
 Training evaluation for providers | Who: Providers When: Before and after each training, and booster training. | Who: Field staff to review forms within 30 days of the training. Could be paper-based then manually entered. | Filled pre- and post each provider training. Evaluating trainee’s knowledge before and after training to assess knowledge gained and any need for specific content in booster training. Roleplay scores can also be used for assessing need for booster training. Booster training to be conducted annually. | India team to assess topic areas that training is not effectively conveying and/or areas that need booster training. Booster and additional trainings created based on findings and need. |
Monitoring Intervention Quality and Delivery | ||||
 Intervention curriculum and delivery protocol | UCSD | N/A | Intervention curriculum for 3 sessions | N/A |
 Session Observation/Checklist forms × 3 for each session Note: This will only take place for 10% of participants; there should be different forms for each intervention session | Who: 10% CHARM Intervention Participants only (both male and female participants) When: At the end of each randomly selected session | Who: Field staff will collect and give to field manager to review and process data When: Once a month. Casefile analyzed as needed bases or at time of observation. | Quality assurance to ensure adherence to curriculum and that providers are providing the full program to participants | Reviewed by NIRRH and PC program manager, monthly; Feedback provided to Providers in monthly meetings. Entered with quantitative data; analyzed biannually; prevalence data used for funder reports |
Participant and Provider Feedback on Intervention | ||||
 Participant Satisfaction Survey | Who: Research team administers satisfaction survey to participants. When: With the 9 months, or 18 months follow up survey if not available at 9-month follow-up | Who: Field staff will collect data. The field manager will input data. Program manager will manage the data When: Frequencies to be run by data analyst monthly to review quality and fidelity data. | Participant satisfaction with CHARM2 intervention | Discussed quarterly with UCSD. India team to discuss in their meetings. |
 IDIs with couple participants (husband and wife separately) | Who: Research team administers satisfaction survey to 10% of participants who received intervention and 10% of participants who quit When: 9 months follow up | Who: Data are translated and transcribed by the field team in India. When: Within 2 days of interview completion. | To document participants’ perceptions of what they received in the intervention, what they learned from the provider, the quality of that learning and how that learning affected their relationship, FP and MSV. | Discussed twice a year. UCSD will compile data and select quotes for inclusion in reports. |
 IDI with providers | Who: Research team administers satisfaction survey to participants When: Biannually, when no survey data is being collected | Who: Field research team When: Twice a year, 6 months apart. | To document providers experiences with intervention delivery, their perceptions of how the intervention affected couples and how they continue to see these couples | Discussed twice a year. UCSD will compile data and select quotes for inclusion in reports. |