Skip to main content

Table 4 Odds of socio-demographic and other background characteristics predicting mother-adolescent communication on reproductive health

From: Reproductive health communication between mother and adolescent daughter in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study

Variables (N = 1174)

Mother-daughter RH communication status

 

Good

Poor

COR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

Religion

 Muslim

556 (66.1)

285 (33.9)

1.00

1.00

 Hindu

84 (77.8)

24 (22.2)

1.79 (1.11–2.89)*

1.76 (1.03–3.00)*

 Buddhist

127 (58.8)

89 (41.2)

0.73 (0.54–0.99)*

1.03 (0.43–2.50)

 Christian and others

3 (33.3)

6 (66.7)

0.26 (0.06–1.03)

0.59 (0.11–2.97)

Race/ethnicity

 Ethnic

113 (56.8)

86 (43.2)

1.00

1.00

 Bengali

657 (67.4)

318 (32.6)

1.57 (1.15–2.15)**

1.08 (0.42–2.81)

Area of residence

 Rural

263 (42.4)

358 (57.6)

1.00

 

 Urban

336 (60.8)

217 (39.2)

2.11 (1.67–2.66)***

 

Family size (persons)

 3–4

253 (71.3)

102 (28.7)

1.00

1.00

 5 and above

517 (63.1)

302 (36.9)

0.69 (0.53–0.90)**

0.69 (0.50–0.95)*

Educational status of the mother

 Illiterate

52 (52.0)

48 (48.0)

1.00

1.00

 Primary

118 (63.4)

68 (36.6)

1.60 (0.98–2.62)

1.25 (0.71–2.20)

 Secondary

258 (68.8)

117 (31.2)

2.04 (1.30–3.19)**

1.22 (0.70–2.15)

 Higher Secondary

162 (67.8)

77 (32.2)

1.94 (1.20–3.13)**

1.01 (0.56–1.81)

 Honors/Degree

103 (70.5)

43 (29.5)

2.21 (1.30–3.76)**

0.99 (0.51–1.95)

 Masters

77 (60.2)

51 (39.8)

1.39 (0.82–2.36)

0.53 (0.26–1.7)

Respondents RH knowledge

 Poor

106 (49.8)

107 (50.2)

1.00

1.00

 Some extent

426 (66.6)

214 (33.4)

2.01 (1.47–2.75)***

1.63 (1.15–2.30)**

 Good

238 (74.1)

83 (25.9)

2.89 (2.01–4.18)***

2.01 (1.31–3.09)**

Perception of Mothers’ RH knowledge

 Poor

100 (53.2)

88 (46.8)

1.00

1.00

 Not sure

58 (45.0)

71 (55.0)

0.72 (0.46–1.13)

0.86 (0.52–1.44)

 Some extent

291 (66.6)

146 (33.4)

1.75 (1.24–2.49)**

1.32 (0.88–1.98)

 Good

321 (76.4)

99 (23.6)

2.85 (1.98–4.11)***

1.93 (1.25–2.97)**

Primary source of RH knowledge

 Mother

509 (70.0)

218 (30.0)

1.00

1.00

 Elder sister

61 (59.8)

41 (40.2)

0.64 (0.42–0.98)*

1.04 (0.64–1.67)

 Friends/Classmates

57 (49.6)

58 (50.4)

0.42 (0.28–0.63)***

0.57 (0.37–0.90)*

 Textbook

123 (67.2)

60 (32.8)

0.88 (0.62–1.24)

1.02 (0.69–1.49)

 Media and others

20 (42.6)

27 (57.4)

0.32 (0.17–0.58)***

0.40 (0.20–0.78)**

Media use of mothers

 Low

364 (60.0)

243 (40.0)

1.00

1.00

 High

406 (71.6)

161 (28.4)

1.68 (1.32–2.15)***

1.58 (1.19–2.10)**

Mother-daughter good relationship

 No

244 (55.1)

199 (44.9)

1.00

1.00

 Yes

526 (72.0)

205 (28.0)

2.09 (1.63–2.68)***

1.36 (1.02–1.81)*

Mother-daughter general communication

 Irregular

97 (41.8)

135 (58.2)

1.00

1.00

 Regular

673 (71.4)

269 (28.6)

3.48 (2.59–4.68)***

2.62 (1.87–3.66)***

Respondent’s attitude about a discussion on RH

 Negative

225 (59.5)

153 (40.5)

1.00

 

 Positive

545 (68.5)

251 (31.5)

1.48 (1.14–1.90)**

 

Comfort of RH communication

 Uncomfortable

201 (55.4)

162 (44.6)

1.00

1.00

 Comfortable

569 (70.2)

242 (29.8)

1.89 (1.47–2.45)***

1.45 (1.09–1.93)*

  1. * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001; 1.0 = consonant; AOR Adjusted odds ratio, COR Crude odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, RH Reproductive health