Table 1 Degree of agreement among the expert panel
Item | Relevance Aiken’s statistic V | CI 95% | Clarity Aiken’s statistic V | CI 95% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1b | 0.89 | 0.72–0.96 | 1 | 0.88–1 |
2b | 0.82 | 0.64–0.92 | 0.93 | 0.73–0.98 |
3b | 0.93 | 0.73–0.98 | 1 | 0.88–1 |
4b | 0.93 | 0.73–0.98 | 0.82 | 0.64–0.92 |
5b | 0.82 | 0.64–0.92 | 1 | 0.88–1 |
6 | 0.82 | 0.64–0.92 | 0.93 | 0.73–0.98 |
7b | 0.82 | 0.64–0.92 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
8b | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
9b | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
10 | 0.93 | 0.73–0.98 | 0.86 | 0.69–0.94 |
11b | 0.82 | 0.64–0.92 | 1 | 0.88–1 |
12a | 0.79 | 0.60–0.90 | – | – |
13b | 0.86 | 0.69–094 | 0.93 | 0.73–0.98 |
14a | 0.68 | 0.49–0.82 | – | – |
15 | 0.93 | 0.73–0.98 | 0.93 | 0.73–0.98 |
16b | 0.86 | 0.69–0.94 | 1 | 0.88–1 |
17a | 0.54 | 0.36–070 | – | – |
18 | 0.89 | 0.72–0.96 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
19 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 | 1 | 0.88–1 |
20a | 0.75 | 0.57–0.87 | – | – |
21a | 0.61 | 0.42–0.76 | – | – |
22a | 0.68 | 0.49–0.82 | – | – |
23a | 0.68 | 0.49–0.82 | – | – |
24a | 0.71 | 0.43–0.85 | – | – |
25b | 1 | 0.88–1 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
26b | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 | 0.82 | 0.64–0.92 |
27 | 1 | 0.88–1 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
28b | 1 | 0.88–1 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
29b | 1 | 0.88–1 | 0.93 | 0.73–0.98 |
30b | 1 | 0.88–1 | 0.93 | 0.73–0.98 |
31b | 1 | 0.88–1 | 0.86 | 0.69–0.94 |
32b | 1 | 0.88–1 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
33b | 1 | 0.88–1 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
34 | 1 | 0.88–1 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
35b | 1 | 0.88–1 | 0.96 | 0.82–0.99 |
36 | 1 | 0.88–1 | 1 | 0.88–1 |
37 | 1 | 0.88–1 | 1 | 0.88–1 |