Skip to main content

Table 3 Knowledge of danger signs and birth preparedness in nested cohort

From: The power of peers: an effectiveness evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal

Knowledge indicators at end line by intervention clusters, n = 114

Participants who identified

Intervention cohort (n = 62)

Control cohort (n = 52)

p-value

Key danger signs during pregnancy

19 (31%)

5 (10%)

0.01

Key danger signs during labor and childbirth

6 (10%)

4 (8%)

0.75

Key danger signs during the postpartum period

7 (11%)

5 (10%)

1.00

Key danger signs in the newborn

2 (3%)

0 (0%)

0.50

Key aspects of birth preparedness

18 (29%)

14 (27%)

0.84

Change in knowledge indicators within intervention clusters, n = 62

Participants who identified

Baseline

Endline

p-value

Key danger signs during pregnancy

1 (2%)

19 (31%)

< 0.001

Key danger signs during labor and childbirth

1 (2%)

6 (10%)

0.06

Key danger signs during the postpartum period

3 (5%)

7 (11%)

0.21

Key danger signs in the newborn

1 (2%)

2 (3%)

0.56

Key aspects of birth preparedness

25 (40%)

18 (29%)

0.16

Change in knowledge indicators within control clusters n = 52

Participants who identified

Baseline

Endline

p-value

Key danger signs during pregnancy

1 (2%)

5 (10%)

0.10

Key danger signs during labor and childbirth

0 (0%)

4 (8%)

^

Key danger signs during the postpartum period

2 (4%)

5 (10%)

0.08

Key danger signs in the newborn

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

^

Key aspects of birth preparedness

22 (42%)

14 (27%)

0.05

  1. ^ No statistics computed since no participants at baseline and/or end line identified signs