Skip to main content

Table 3 Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression to assess relationship between counseling and contraceptive use during round 2 of survey (N = 1398)

From: Family planning counseling and its associations with modern contraceptive use, initiation, and continuation in rural Uttar Pradesh, India

 

Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

FP counseling experience (during 2 years between the surveys)

 No counselling

REF

REF

 Lower quality counseling

2.11 (1.40–3.18) ***

2.42 (1.56–3.76) ***

 Higher quality counseling

4.07 (1.79–9.26) ***

4.14 (1.72–9.99) ***

Reproductive history

 Age at first birth (continuous)

0.99 (0.98–1.004)

0.99 (0.98–1.00)

 Birth parity (continuous)

0.92 (0.84–1.006) *

0.93 (0.82–1.03)

 Any living son

  No

REF

REF

  Yes

0.95 (0.57–1.55)

1.19 (0.62–1.83)

Socio-demographics

 Age at marriage (continuous)

1.04 (0.94–1.16)

1.02 (0.90–1.16)

 Age of woman (continuous)

0.99 (0.96–1.01)

1.00 (0.97–1.02)

 Caste

  SC/ST

REF

REF

  OBC

0.99 (0.64–1.55)

0.99 (0.65–1.49)

  General

1.56 (0.98–2.47) *

1.21 (0.75–1.95)

 Religion

  Hindu/Others

REF

REF

  Muslim

0.62 (0.37–1.01) *

0.64 (0.38–1.07) *

 Wealth index (continuous)

1.01 (1.003–1.02) **

1.01 (1.001–1.02) **

 Literacy

  Illiterate

REF

REF

  Literate

1.46 (0.96–2.24) *

1.11 (0.71–1.72)

 Husband’s education

  Not completed primary education

REF

REF

  Completed primary education

1.13 (0.75–1.69)

0.72 (0.49–1.05) *

  1. *p < 0.10 ** p < 0.05 ***p < 0.01