Validation of family planning tool in the pastoralist community

Table 6 Confirmatory factor analyses of FP related tools: (n = 891)

Variable	×²	df	×²/df	RMSEA (90%CI)	SRMR	CFI	TLI
Intention to use of FP	258	13	19.8	0.146(0.130,0.161)	0.045	0.969	0.950
Perceived male involvement	2266	54	41.9	0.218(0.210,0.226)	0.042	0.854	0.824
Knowledge on FP	285	62	4.5	0.064(0.056,.0.71)	0.039	0.969	0.961
Expressional attitude	534	32	16.6	0.133(0.123,0.143)	0.051	0.912	0.886
Instrumental attitude	2310	101	22.8	0.157(0.151,0.162)	0.146	0.723	0.671
Subjective norm	2235	207	10.7	0.105(0.101,0.109)	0.075	0.844	0.826
Perceived control	1032	34	30.3	0.182(0.171,0.191)	0.041	0.891	0.856
Self-efficacy	212	14	15.1	0.126(0.111,0.141)	0.041	0.957	0.936

x²/df Normed chi-square, RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, SRMR standardized Root Mean Square Residual, CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker- Lewis Index

ISSN: 1742-4755