Skip to main content

Table 1 Table describing salient features of included studies

From: A systematic review on clinical effectiveness, side-effect profile and meta-analysis on continuation rate of etonogestrel contraceptive implant

Author, country and year

Type of study

sample size

Comparator (s)

Effectiveness

Effect(s) reported frequency (percentage)

Continuation rate reported

Follow-up period

Reference number

Study design: cohort study

 Abraham M et al., USA, 2015

CHOICE cohort study

n = 6106

Cu-IUD, Age and parity

NA

NA

ENG implant continuation rate varied from 83 to 92% at 1 year and from 59 to 72% at 2 years. Nulliparous female were more likely to discontinue their LARC method among implant users adjusted HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.35–2.64

1, 2 years

[53]

 Peipert et al., USA, 2011

CHOICE cohort study

n = 5087

LNG IUS, Cu-IUD and Etonogestrel implant

NA

NA

Continuation rate at one year for ENG implant was 83%

1 year

[63]

 Neil O callahan et al., USA, 2013

CHOICE cohort study

n = 9256

LNG IUS, Cu-IUD and Etonogestrel implant

NA

NA

24-month continuation rate for implant was 69%

2 years

[72]

 Grunloh et al., USA, 2013

CHOICE cohort study

n = 6167

LNG IUS, Cu-IUD and Etonogestrel implant

NA

NA

Discontinuation rates was 6.9% for the implant

6 months

[59]

 Vickery et al., USA, 2013

CHOICE cohort study

n = 427

DMPA, LNG-IUS, Cu-IUD, ENG-implant

NA

No difference in weight gain

NA

1 year

[45]

 Agostini et al., France, 2018

Retrospective cohort study

n = 42,365

COCs, progestin-only oral contraceptives, Cu-IUD, LNG-IUS and ENG implant

NA

NA

83.6% for the ENG implant

Up to 2 years

[54]

 Berenson et al., USA, 2014

Retrospective study

LNG-IUS (n = 79,920) or ENG implants (n = 7374) inserted

LNG-IUS and ENG implant

98.821% for ESI and 98.8713% in LNG-IUS

The most frequent complications with both methods were related to abnormal menstruation, which was more likely to occur among ENG implant users

14.82% of ENG implant users discontinued within 1 year of insertion

1 year

[38]

 Bitzer et al., Switzerland, 2004

Retrospective study

n = 1183

None

NA

Side-effects (visit 1) included infrequent bleeding (28%), amenorrhea (33%), prolonged bleeding (15%), and metromenorrhagia (frequent and heavy bleeding) (16%). Other reported side-effects at visit 1 included dizziness (12%), acne (11%), mood swings (8%) and headache (5%)

Implanon was removed prematurely in 235 women − 24%

 

[41]

 Chiles et al., USA, 2016

Retrospective cohort study

 > 1.7 million women, aged 14–40 years

LNG IUS, Cu-IUD and Etonogestrel implant

NA

NA

Among women who selected the implant, 32.0% continued their method at 36 months

3 years

[57]

 Sara e casey, Democratic Republic of Congo, 2017

Retrospective cohort study

n = 548

Implant, IUD, Injection and Pill

NA

NA

Discontinuation rate at one year for LARC users(IUD and implant) was 13.9%

1 year

[42]

 Thamkantho et al., Thailand, 2008

Retrospective clinic based study

n = 166

None

0 pregnancy in 1 year of use

30.3% had regular menstrual flow for a few months alternately with no menses for a few months; prolonged menstrual bleeding most common

NA

1 year

[33]

 Teunissen et al., Netherlands, 2014

Retrospective consecutive cohort design

n = 230

None

NA

NA

The continuation rate after 12 months was 72%; after 24 months, 53%; and after 36 months, 25%, with all women concerned having a new implant placed

1, 2, 3 years

[69]

 Sznajder et al., USA, 2016

Retrospective cohort data

n = 160 (12–24 years age)

LNG-IUS and ENG implant

NA

NA

Dis-continuation rate at one year for ENG implant was 22.68%

1 year

[68]

 Howard et al., USA, 2017

Retrospective cohort study

Retrospective cohort study based on billing records from a large multispecialty private practice in Las Vegas, Nevada

None

NA

NA

There was a progressive decrease in the 12-month continuation of implant from 2013 (95.7%) to 2015 (57.7%)

1 year

[61]

 Aisien et al., Nigeria, 2010

Prospective Longitudinal

n = 32

None

100%

Oligomenorrhea: 18 (56.3%) Menorrhagia: 1(3.1%) and Combination: 13 (40.6%) Headache: 4 (12.5%) and Reduced libido: 3 (9.4%)

Continuation rate at 1 year for ENG implant was 93.8%

12 months

[27]

 Weisberg et al., Australia, 2014

Prospective Longitudinal

n = 349

LNG-IUS and ENG implant

NA

NA

47% of implant users discontinued within three years

3 years

[70]

 Rominski et al., Ghana, 2018

Pilot longitudinal study

–

Implant, IUD, Injection and Pill

NA

NA

Continuation rate at one year for ENG implant was 95%

1 year

[65]

 Arribas et al., Spain, 2009

Prospective

n = 356

None

100%

NA

Continuation rates were 91.0% at 1 year, 74.7% at 2 years and 65.1% at 2 years and 9 months

1, 2, 2 year 9 months

[28]

 Boas et al., Brazil, 2016

Prospective cohort study

n = 213 healthy women

None

NA

Increase in weight (63.3–66.1) and BMI (24.7–25.7) and a decrease in TC (172–161.5), TG (75–69.5), and LDL (100.5–98.5) (p > 0.05). Of the metabolic variables, FBG (85–88) and HDL (53–46) had significant differences (p < 0.002)

NA

1, 2, 3 years

[47]

 Guazelli et al., Brazil, 2010

Prospective study

n = 47

None

NA

Increase in mean hemoglobin, hematocrit and indirect bilirubin concentrations and of the HDL-C/TC and HDL-C/LDL-C ratio. Decrease in mean TC level as well as LDL-C, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG, SGOT and SGPT

NA

1 year

[46]

 Hidalgo et al., Brazil, 2006

Prospective study

n = 344

LNG implant, Cu-IUD

NA

Implanon, Jadelle and Cu-IUD, 12-month ovarian cyst incidence rates were 26.7%, 14.6% and 1.2%. They regress spontaneously and do not require further treatment

NA

1 year

[52]

 Iversen et al., Denmark, 2018

Prospective cohort study

n = 1,879,227

Hormonal contraception

NA

Use of progestogen-only products was not associated with ovarian cancer risk

NA

20 years

[50]

 K Gezginc et al., Turkey, 2007

Prospective study

n = 80

None

100%

Amenorrhoea, infrequent bleeding and frequent bleeding were reported by 33(41.25%), 19 (23.75%) and 14 women (17.5%)

25% discontinuation in the study period of 2 years

2 years

[29]

 Lidegaard et al., Denmark, 2012

Prospective cohort

n = 1,626,158

OCP, LNG-IUD, Vaginal Ring, Patch and Implant

NA

No significant increase in the risk of thrombotic stroke or myocardial infarction

NA

15 years

[51]

 Modesto, Brazil, 2014

Prospective cohort

n = 150

Cu-IUD, ENG-implant

NA

No significant differences on BMD. Increase in body weight (p 0.001) and an increase of 2% in the percentage of body fat, when compared with Cu-IUD users. Increase in lean mass (p = 0.020)

NA

1 year

[44]

 Morch et al., Denmark, 2017

Prospective cohort study

n = 1.8 million

OCP, LNG-IUD, Vaginal Ring, Patch and Implant

NA

As compared with never users of contraception, relative risk of breast cancer among implant users was 0.93 (0.48–1.79)

NA

Average of 10.9 years

[49]

 Winner et al., USA, 2007

Prospective cohort

n = 7486

DMPA and PPR (Pill, patch, ring)

0.27 per 100 participant-years in LARC as compared to 0.22 in DMPA and 4.55 in PPR

NA

NA

3 years for first 5090 participants and 2 years for those after

[34]

 Birgisson et al., USA, 2015

Observational Cohort

n = > 9000

LNG IUS, Cu-IUD and Etonogestrel implant, Patch, Pill and Ring

Combined LARC (LNG-IUS, Copper- IUD and implant) failure rate at 1, 2 and 3 years was 0.3%, 0.6% and 0.9% as compared to 4.8%, 7.8% and 9.4% among short acting contraceptive users

NA

12 and 24 month continuation rate was 83% and 68%

1, 2 years

[39]

 Cea Soriano et al., UK, 2014

Prospective Observational study

–

Cu-IUD, LNG-IUS and DMPA injections

NA

NA

13.2% of ENG Implant users discontinued in first year of use

1 year

[56]

 Short et al., 4 EU countries, 2012

Prospective Observational study

n = 311

LNG-IUS and ENG implant

NA

NA

Continuation rate at 1 year for ENG implant was 86%

1 year

[67]

Randomised controlled trial

 Apter 2016

RCT

Multicentre RCT n = 766

LNG-IUS and ENG implant

The PIs for LNG-IUS and the ENG implant were 0.9 (95% CI 0.2–2.6) and 0.0 (95% CI 0.0–1.2), respectively

The incidence of adverse events was 84.3% and 79.5% in the LNG-IUS 8 and the ENG implant groups, respectively. In LNG-IUS users: Dysmenorrhea (33.5%), uterine spasms (16.2%), procedural pain (13.6%), headache (11.3%), and acne (9.9%). In ENG implant users, acne (15.5%), headache (12.3%), dysmenorrhea (12.3%), nasopharyngitis (9.2%), and cervical dysplasia (8.9%)

The 12-month discontinuation rates were 19.6% and 26.8% in the LNG-IUS 8 and ENG implant groups, respectively

1 year

[35]

 Flores et al., Mexico, 2005

Multicenter trial

n = 417

None

The Pearl Index score was 0

NA

The continuation rate at the end of 3 years was 61.4%

3 years

[25]

 Bahamondes et al., Multicentre-seven countries, 2015

Open parallel group RCT

n = 2963

Copper IUD-380A, LNG-implant and ENG implant

0.4 per 100 woman years (CI 0.1–1.4) in ENG implant; 2.8 ( CI 1.3–6.0) in Cu-IUD

ENG implant: Amenorrhea: 38.9%, irregular bleeding: 86.0%, heavy bleeding: 35.38%, prolonged: 56.18%; acne: 45.23%; headache: 59.6% and lower abd pain: 50.35%; dizziness: 44.52% and PID: 1.21% Copper IUD: Amenorrhea: 8.65%, irregular bleeding: 38.93%, heavy bleeding: 49.85%, prolonged: 42.95%; acne: 32.23%; headache: 53.24% and lower abd pain: 61.17% dizziness: 39.96% and PID: 2.68%

Method continuation rates for ENG implant at 2.5 years was 69.8 (95% CI 66.8–72.6)

2.5 years

[37]

 Hubacher wt al, USA, 2016

randomized patient preference trial

n = 916

OCP, DMPA, IUD and implant

Implant and IUD (combined) was 0.7 (0.0–4.7) OC: 6.1 (4.3–8.6) DMPA: 4.6 (0.2–12.2)

NA

At one year, probability of continuation of implant was 77.5% (70.2–84.8)

1 year

[36]

 Oderich et al., Brazil, 2010

Nonrandomized, open-label, prospective controlled tria

n = 40

Cu IUD and implant

NA

Carbohydrate metabolism was not modified

NA

6, 12 months

[48]

 Study design: cross-sectional study

 Nageso et al., Ethiopia, 2018

Cross-sectional study design

n = 711

None

NA

NA

Early Implanon discontinuation rate in this study was 23.4%

1 year

[73]

 Gupta et al.,Papua New Guinea, 2017

Cross sectional study

n = 860

None

0.992

Irregular bleeding n = 178, 20.6% but only 7% (n = 13) said the bleeding was bothersome

97% (n = 836) still had the device in situ after 12 months

1 year

[30]

 Medhin TG et al., Ethiopia, 2019

Cross sectional study

n = 229

None

NA

NA

Discontinuation: early Implanon discontinuation rate was 38%, 95% CI (32%, 44%).Discontinuation rate was (2.6%) within 6 months, (15.7%) 1 year, (19.7%) in 2 years and (62%) in 3 years

At 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years

[71]

 Smith et al., USA, 2018

Pilot study

n = 29

COCP, Progestin-only contraceptive, non-hormonal or no contraceptive

NA

Progestin-only-contraceptives users have a potential of developing depressive symptoms and have attenuated beta arrestin-1 protein levels in peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes

NA

Unclear

[76]

 Yildizbas et al., Turkey, 2007

A pilot study

n = 41

None

NA

34.1% had amenorrhea; 58.5% had some type of abnormal bleeding. Mood change in 17.1% and acne in 26.8%

NA

6 months

[40]

Study design: retrospective chart review

 Peterson et al., USA, 2019

Retrospective chart review

n = 544

None

NA

NA

Discontinuation rate at one year for ENG implant was 16%

1 year

[64]

 Romano et al., USA, 2019

Retrospective chart review

n = 197

Non-users of implant

NA

ENG implant users weight gain + 3.6 (± 7.8) kg vs + 3.1 (± 5.9) kg for controls (P = 0.43). Overall regression analyses showed no group differences among cases and controls

The mean duration of ENG use was 24.5 (± 9.3) months with 21.8% of users (43/197) discontinuing the method early (before 3 years)

20 months

[43]

 Mutihir et al., Nigeria, 2010

Retrospective review

n = 669

None

98.51%

NA

95.5% at the end of second year

2 years

[31]

 Smith et al., UK, 2002

Retrospective record review and postal survey

n = 190

None

100%

NA

Continuation rates were between 84 and 88% at 6 months and 67% and 78% at 12 months

6, 12 months

[32]

 Berlan et al., USA, 2016

Retrospective chart review

n = 750 adolescents

None

NA

NA

77 (10.3%) had the device removed prior to 12 months of use

1 year

[55]

 Griffith et al., Australia, 2016

Mixed method study; retrospective chart review

–

Cu-IUD, MPA injection, COCP and ENG-Implant

NA

NA

Etonogestrel continuation rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 87% (95% CI 81–92%), 72% (95% CI 64–78%) and 51% (95% CI 41–60%) respectively

1, 2, 3 years

[58]

 Casey et al., USA, 2010

Retrospective review of medical records

n = 151

None

NA

39 (25.2%) women had abnormal bleeding

Implant removal rate was 25.2% (mean interval, 9.8 months)

90 day reference periods. No fixed follow up

[74]

 Harvey et al., Australia, 2009

Retrospective chart

n = 767

None

NA

NA

Continuation at 6 months after insertion was 94%. 74% continued at 1 year, 61% continued at 1.5 years and 50% continued at 2 years.1.2% continued beyond 3 years

Every 6 months up to 3 years

[60]

 Sanders et al., USA, 2017

Retrospective chart review

n = 1008

LNG-IUS and Cu-IUD-T380A

NA

NA

Two-year continuation rate 75.9%( 68-mg Etonogestrel implant)

2 years

[66]

 Lakha et al., UK, 2006

Case notes Review

n = 324

None

NA

NA

Continuation rates were 89% (CI 84–91) at 6 months, 75% (CI 69–79) at 1 year, 59% (CI 52–63) at 2 years and 47% (CI 40–52) at 2 years and 9 months

Every 6 months upto 3 years

[62]

 Agrawal et al., UK, 2005

Case note-based study

n = 106

None

100%

NA

The continuation rate at the end of 1 year was 69.8%, at 2 years was 44.1% and at 3 years was 30.2%

1, 2, 3 years

[26]