Skip to main content

Table 3 Attitudes towards NASG utilization among health care professionals who were working in Jimma zone public Hospitals Southwest Ethiopia, April 2019

From: Utilization of non-pneumatic anti-shock garment and associated factors for postpartum hemorrhage management among health care professionals’ in public hospitals of Jimma zone, south-West Ethiopia, 2019

Variables

Agree

neutral

Disagree

No (%)

No (%)

No (%)

The use of non-pneumatic anti shock garment is necessary for the management of postpartum hemorrhage in all settings.

147 (70)

49 (23.3)

14 (6.7)

NASG used along with standard treatment protocols of postpartum hemorrhage.

143 (68.1)

55 (26.2)

12 (5.7)

NASG can be applied with minimum procedures in short period of time.

100 (47.6)

55 (26.2)

55 (26.2)

Removal NASG requires a lot of procedures that takes time.

120 (57.1)

40 (19.1)

50 (23.8)

Anti-shock garment is only beneficial to people in the rural areas/primary care settings

28 (13.3)

55 (26.2)

127 (60.5)

Manual removal of placenta is possible with NASG in place

141 (67.1)

43 (20.5)

26 (12.4)

Anti-shock garment is effective in patients with cervical lacerations

104 (49.5)

67 (31.9)

39 (18.6)

The garment should be a must in every health care facility that has maternity service

144 (68.6)

35 (16.7)

31 (14.8)