Skip to main content

Table 1 Current published data regarding SARS-CoV-2 detection in semen samples and the parameters used in the studies

From: Comparative analysis of viral infection outcomes in human seminal fluid from prior viral epidemics and Sars-CoV-2 may offer trends for viral sexual transmissibility and long-term reproductive health implications

 

Li et al. 2020 (JAMA)

Pan et al. 2020 (F + S)

Holtmann et al. 2020 (F + S)

Song et al. 2020 (Biol Reprod)

Guo et al. 2020 (Andrology)

Kayaaslan et al. 2020 (Urol Int)

Rawlings et al. 2020 (OFID)

Ma et al. 2021 (J Med Virol)

Machado et al. 2021 (Infect Dis Rep)

Location

Shangqiu, China

Wuhan, China

Duesseldorf, Germany

Wuhan, China

Wuhan, China

Ankara, Turkey

California, USA

Wuhan, China

Arkansas, USA

Sample Size

38

34

34 (18 with disease)

13 (12 semen samples)

23

16

6

12

15

Disease Type

Severe: 38

Positive Tests:

Acute Stage: 4

Recovery Stage: 2

Mild: 34

Mild: 14

Moderate: 4

Asymptomatic: 1

Mild: 11

Mild: 18

Moderate: 5

Mild: 11

Moderate: 5

Unknown

Mild: 1

Moderate: 11

Asymptomatic: 2

Mild to Moderate: 13

Method of Disease Confirmation

RT-PCR

RT-PCR

RT-PCR

RT-PCR

RT-PCR

RT-PCR

RT-PCR

RT-PCR

RT-PCR

Detection in Semen?

6/38

0/34

0/18

0/12

0/1 In Testis Sample

0/23

0/16

0/6

0/12

1/15

Days after Diagnosis

6–16

8–75

8–54

Unknown

27–33

0–7

6–17

56–109

0–14