Skip to main content

Table 2 Unadjusted and adjusted poisson regression between couple concordance of women’s involvement in contraceptive decision making and current modern contraceptive use among married couples enrolled in CHARM2 in rural Maharashtra, India (N = 961)

From: Male–female concordance in reported involvement of women in contraceptive decision-making and its association with modern contraceptive use among couples in rural Maharashtra, India

Variable Unadjusted Adjusted
Couple concordance of women’s involvement in contraceptive decision making RR (95% CI) RR (95% CI)
Concordant 1 (women and men agreement): Women-Involved (women only or joint) ref ref
Concordant 2: Women Uninvolved (men only or other) 0.64 (0.39–1.04) 0.79 (0.54–1.18)
Discordant 1: Women-Report Women Involved and Men-Report Women Uninvolved 0.82 (0.64–1.05) 0.82 (0.66–1.02)
Discordant 2: Women-Report Women Uninvolved and Men-Report Women Involved 0.52 (0.38–0.72) 0.61 (0.45–0.83)
  1. Adjusted for age, age at marriage, husbands age, education, husband’s education, caste, religion, parity, any living sons, and Below Poverty Line status, knowledge of family planning methods, fertility desires, husband’s knowledge of family planning methods, physical or sexual IPV, and concordance of FP discussion. ORs in bold represent statistically significant difference at 95% confidence interval