Skip to main content

Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted multinomial logistic regression between couple concordance of women’s involvement in contraceptive decision making and type of contraceptive use among married couples enrolled in CHARM2 in rural Maharashtra, India (N = 958)

From: Male–female concordance in reported involvement of women in contraceptive decision-making and its association with modern contraceptive use among couples in rural Maharashtra, India

Variable Unadjusted Adjusted
  OR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
Non-modern (withdrawal, rhythm)   
Concordant 1 (women and men agreement): Women-Involved (women only or joint) Ref Ref
Concordant 2: Women Uninvolved (men only or other) 1.32 (0.62–2.83) 1.35 (0.59–3.11)
Discordant 1: Women-Report Women Involved and Men-Report Women Uninvolved 1.01 (0.62–1.65) 0.84 (0.49–1.42)
Discordant 2: Women-Report Women Uninvolved and Men-Report Women Involved 0.75 (0.46–1.22) 0.86 (0.51–1.47)
Male condoms   
Concordant 1 (women and men agreement): Women-Involved (women only or joint) Ref Ref
Concordant 2: Women Uninvolved (men only or other) 0.75 (0.32–1.74) 0.98 (0.38–2.52)
Discordant 1: Women-Report Women Involved and Men-Report Women Uninvolved 0.96 (0.60–1.54) 0.86 (0.50–1.48)
Discordant 2: Women-Report Women Uninvolved and Men-Report Women Involved 0.40 (0.23–0.70) 0.49 (0.26–0.92)
Pills   
Concordant 1 (women and men agreement): Women-Involved (women only or joint) Ref Ref
Concordant 2: Women Uninvolved (men only or other) ** **
Discordant 1: Women-Report Women Involved and Men-Report Women Uninvolved 0.52 (0.15–1.78) 0.34 (0.09–1.29)
Discordant 2: Women-Report Women Uninvolved and Men-Report Women Involved ** **
IUD   
Concordant 1 (women and men agreement): Women-Involved (women only or joint) Ref Ref
Concordant 2: Women Uninvolved (men only or other) 0.43 (10–1.90) 0.53 (0.11–2.47)
Discordant 1: Women-Report Women Involved and Men-Report Women Uninvolved 0.48 (0.21–1.10) 0.42 (0.18–1.00)
Discordant 2: Women-Report Women Uninvolved and Men-Report Women Involved 0.38 (1.17–0.87) 0.37 (0.16–0.89)
  1. Adjusted for age, age at marriage, husbands age, education, husband’s education, caste, religion, parity, any living sons, and Below Poverty Line status, knowledge of family planning methods, fertility desires, husband’s knowledge of family planning methods, physical or sexual IPV, and concordance of FP discussion. ORs in bold represent statistically significant difference at 95% confidence interval
  2. Figures in bold indicate that the differences are statistically and significantly different from zero at the 95% confidence level
  3. **Empty cell could not be calculated