Skip to main content

Table 1 Socio-demographics of study population, stratified by gender

From: The pattern of romantic and sexual related experiences among Chinese young adolescents: an exploration with multi-group latent class analysis

  

Males (N=871, 50.8%)

Females (N=843, 49.2%)

Total (N=1714)

  

\(N/{\bar {X}}\)

%/SD

\(N/{\bar {X}}\)

%/SD

\(N/{\bar {X}}\)

%/ SD

Micro-level

 Age*

≤12

412

47.3%

442

52.4%

854

49.8%

 

13–14

459

52.7%

401

47.6%

860

50.2%

 Freedom of move**(\(\overline{\mathrm{X} }\)±SD)

Cont.

2.6

0.8

2.5

0.7

2.5

0.7

 Decision-making**(\(\overline{\mathrm{X} }\)±SD)

Cont.

3.3

0.7

3.4

0.7

3.4

0.7

Meso-level

 Parent monitoring***

High

682

78.6%

739

87.9%

1421

83.2%

 

Low

186

21.4%

102

12.1%

288

16.8%

 Friends of both gender***

Yes

476

59.1%

399

49.9%

875

54.5%

 

No

329

40.2%

401

50.1%

730

45.5%

 Have friends drink

Yes

23

3.0%

15

2.0%

38

2.5%

 

No

      

 Romantic engagement***

Ever

129

17.2%

77

10.0%

206

13.6%

 

Never

621

82.8%

692

90.0%

1313

86.4%

 School connectedness

Yes

748

92.4%

711

91.2%

1459

91.7%

 

No

62

7.6%

69

8.8%

131

8.3%

 Neighborhood cohesion

High

515

62.1%

478

59.4%

993

60.7%

 

Low

315

37.9%

327

40.6%

642

39.3%

Macro-level

 Sexual double standard

High.

367

44.8%

521

64.6%

888

54.6%

 

Low

452

55.2%

285

35.4%

737

45.4%

  1. Total number of each column within the variable may not sum up to the sample/sub-sample size due to missing or/and refusing to answer. Gender differences are compared, ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05