Skip to main content

Table 1 The comparisons of RHPAS scores in terms of sociodemographic features and general health status (n = 306)

From: Effects of the pandemic on women’s reproductive health protective attitudes: a Turkish sample

 

n (%)

RHPAS

Significance

\(\overline{\mathrm{X} }\) ± SS

Age

 Younger than  25 years

88 (28.8)

140.9 ± 22.7

F = 0.083

p = 0.921

 25–35 years

73 (33.9)

139.9 ± 19.4

 Older than 35 years

145 (47.4)

141.1 ± 19.8

Education

 Illiterate

10 (3.3)

125.7 ± 13.6

*F = 7.276

p = 0.000

 Primary education

66 (21.6)

132.8 ± 20.5

 High school

49 (16.0)

145.7 ± 17.2

 University and a higher education level

181 (59.2)

143.1 ± 20.6

Employment

 Paid job

124 (40.5)

146.0 ± 18.2

**t = 3.805

p = 0.000

 Unpaid job

182 (59.5)

137.1 ± 21.3

Income

 Lower than expenses

78 (25.5)

131.5 ± 20.2

F = 11.795

p = 0.000

 Equal to expenses

154 (50.3)

143.0 ± 20.4

 Higher than expenses

74 (24.2)

145.7 ± 18.2

Health insurance

 Yes

242 (79.1)

143.1 ± 20.7

t = 3.911

p = 0.000

 No

64 (20.9)

132.0 ± 17.2

Smoking

 Smoker

45 (14.7)

140.1 ± 20.8

F = 2.866

p = 0.058

 Ex-smoker

13 (4.2)

154.0 ± 19.6

 Nonsmoker

243(81.1)

140.3 ± 18.4

Perceived health status

 Very good

16 (5.2)

148.5 ± 21.7

F = 7.184

p = 0.000

 Good

162 (52.9)

144.6 ± 19.2

 Moderate

122 (39.9)

135.5 ± 20.8

 Poor

6 (2)

123.3 ± 14.1

Presence of chronic diseases

 Yes

56 (18.3)

139.5 ± 21.6

t = − 0.519

 No

250(81.7)

141.0 ± 20.3

p = 0.619

  1. RHPAS: Determination of Married Women’s Reproductive Health Protective Attitudes Scale
  2. *F = ANOVA test, **t = Independent Groups t-test