Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of subgroup analysis results

From: Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

Groups

No. trials

No. patients

RR (95 % CI)

P value

I2, %

P value of heterogeneity

All studied

14

1662

1.23 (1.05, 1.43)

0.009

83

< 0.00001

Administration route of probiotics

 Oral

5

351

1.63 (1.19, 2.22)

0.002

71

0.008

 Vagina

8

1282

1.11 (0.96, 1.28)

0.17

79

< 0.0001

 Oral plus Vagina

1

29

0.52 (0.24, 1.16)

0.11

/

/

Diagnosis standards

 Nugent score

7

579

1.01 (0.88, 1.16)

0.89

50

0.06

 Amsel’s criteria

4

554

1.81 (0.90, 3.64)

0.09

96

< 0.00001

 Amsel and/or Nugent score

3

529

1.26 (0.96, 2.29)

0.19

84

0.002

Recruitment area of participants

 Europe

6

529

1.13 (0.93, 1.38)

0.21

73

0.002

 Non-Europe

8

1199

1.20 (0.95, 1.51)

0.13

87

< 0.00001

Follow-up time

 Short-term

(≤ 1 month)

11

1149

1.21 (1.01, 1.44)

0.04

84

< 0.00001

 Long-term

(≥ 1 month)

3

513

1.35 (0.87, 2.10)

0.18

85

0.001

Species of probiotics

 Single species

6

995

1.19 [0.99, 1.43]

0.06

85

< 0.00001

 Multiple species

8

667

1.25 [0.93, 1.69]

0.14

83

< 0.00001

Use of L. rhamnose

 Yes

11

987

1.28 [1.02, 1.60]

0.03

84

< 0.00001

 No

3

675

1.07 [0.92, 1.25]

0.37

64

0.06

Dosage of probiotics

 < 1 × 109

7

929

1.03 [0.94, 1.12]

0.57

42

0.11

 ≥ 1 × 109

7

733

1.54 [1.13, 2.08]

0.006

77

0.0002