Skip to main content

Table 5 Social determinants of access to quality PNC visits in Nepal, 2016 (N = 999)

From: High coverage but low quality of maternal and newborn health services in the coverage cascade: who is benefitted and left behind in accessing better quality health services in Nepal?

Determinants

Categories

Frequency (N = 999)

%

p

PNC visit

cOR (95% CI)

PNC visit aOR (95% CI)

Structural

Wealth rank

Lower (40%)

329

60.8

0.035

1.00

 
 

Upper (60%)

670

69.3

 

1.45 (1.03, 2.06)*

 

Ethnicity

Disadvantaged

615

64.0

0.110

1.00

 
 

Advantaged

384

70.5

 

1.35 (0.93, 1.94)

 

Religion

Others

145

66.4

0.990

1.00

 
 

Hindu

854

66.5

 

1.00 (0.65, 1.55)

 

Occupation

Not working

467

63.9

0.060

1.00

 
 

Agriculture

387

65.6

 

1.08 (0.77, 1.50)

 
 

Working paid

146

77.1

 

1.90 (1.09, 3.32)*

 

Maternal education

Illiterate

207

60.9

0.060

1.00

 
 

Primary

160

61.6

 

1.03 (0.64, 1.65)

 
 

Secondary higher

632

69.6

 

1.47 (0.99, 2.19)

 

Decision-making

Yes

354

68.9

0.342

1.18 (0.84, 1.66)

 
 

No

645

65.2

 

1.00

 

Intermediary

Language

Nepali

484

68.1

0.008

0.80 (0.55, 1.18)

0.65* (0.43, 0.99)

 

Maithili

147

56.1

 

0.48 (0.29, 0.80)**

0.48 (0.22, 1.09)

 

Bhojpuri

90

55.4

 

0.46 (0.26, 0.84)*

0.59 (0.29, 1.22)

 

Others

278

72.7

 

1.00

1.00

Residence

Urban

611

67.3

0.597

  
 

Rural

388

65.3

 

0.91 (0.65, 1.28)

 

Province

One

184

75.6

0.001

1.00

 
 

Two

196

53.9

 

0.38 (0.23, 0.63)***

0.73 (0.37, 1.46)

 

Bagmati

196

70.4

 

0.77 (0.41, 1.45)

0.65 (0.34, 1.23)

 

Gandaki

105

76.0

 

1.03 (0.52, 2.01)

0.92 (0.47, 1.81)

 

Lumbini

187

67.4

 

0.67 (0.41, 1.08)

0.72 (0.44, 1.18)

 

Karnali

44

45.1

 

0.27 (0.15, 0.47)***

0.34 (0.18, 0.64)***

 

Sudurpaschim

87

64.3

 

0.58 (0.36, 0.93)*

0.56 (0.31, 0.99)*

Region

Mountain

60

72.5

0.019

1.05 (0.54, 2.05)

 
 

Hill

434

71.5

 

1.00

 
 

Terai

505

61.5

 

0.64(0.44, 0.91) *

 

Maternal age (years)

15–19

145

65.8

0.838

1.00

 
 

20–34

813

66.4

 

1.03(0.69, 1.53)

 
 

35+

41

71.0

 

1.27 (0.53, 3.02)

 

Birth order

< 4

903

68.4

0.001

1.00

1.00

 

≥ 4

96

48.7

 

0.44 (0.27, 0.71)***

0.52 (0.29, 0.93)*

Sex of child (index child)

Male

563

67.3

0.631

1.00

 
 

Female

436

65.5

 

0.92 (0.67, 1.28)

 

Access to bank account

No

606

63.3

0.022

1.00

 
 

Yes

393

71.5

 

1.45 (1.05, 2.01)*

 

Media exposure

Yes

667

70.4

 

1.69 (1.21, 2.34)**

 
 

No

606

63.3

0.022

1.00

 

Last birth (index child)

Wanted

816

66.0

 

1.00

 
 

Unwanted

183

68.7

0.516

0.88 (0.61, 1.28)

 

Distance to health facilities as a perceived problem

No problem

468

70.6

0.037

1.00

 
 

Problem

531

62.9

 

0.71 (0.51, 0.98)*

 

Health system

Perceived problem not having female providers

No perceived problem

349

73.8

0.002

1.00

1.00

 

Perceived problem

650

62.6

 

0.59 (0.42, 0.83)**

0.67 (0.47, 0.96)*

Awareness of health mothers’ group in the community

Yes

364

65.6

0.701

0.94 (0.68, 1.29)

 
 

No

635

67.0

 

1.00

 

C-section delivery

Yes

165

86.9

< 0.001

4.00 (2.30, 6.95)***

4.20 (2.29, 7.68)***

 

No

834

62.4

 

1.00

1.00

Quality of 4+ ANC visits

Poor

383

56.9

< 0.001

1.00

1.00

Optimal

615

72.5

 

2.00 (1.45, 2.76)***

1.69 (1.18, 2.43)**

Quality of ID

Poor

541

64.0

0.111

  

Optimal

457

69.4

   
  1. ID institutional delivery
  2. Significance at ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Hosmer Lemeshow test (p = 0.493)