Skip to main content

Table 4 Bivariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis SRH service utilization among secondary school students in Haramaya District, 2020

From: Sexual and reproductive health services utilization and associated factors among adolescents attending secondary schools

Variables

Utilization of SRH

COR,95%CI

AOR.95%CI

Yes (%)

No (%)

Age

    

 15–17

40 (17.3%)

191 (82.7%)

1.00

1.00

 18–19

111 (27%)

300 (73%)

1.77 (1.17–2.64)

1.23 (0.78–1.96)

Marital status

    

 Single

108 (19.7%)

441 (80.3%)

1.00

1.00

 Married

43 (46.2%)

50 (53.8%)

3.51 (2.21–5.55)

1.37 (0.37–5.04)

Living arrangements

    

 With family

102 (19.5%)

421 (80.5%)

0.35 (0.23–0.53)

0.62 (0.22–1.74)

 Not with family

49 (41.2%)

70 (58.8%)

1.00

1.00

Have own income

    

 Yes

33 (36.7%)

57 (63%)

2.13 (1.32–3.4)

1.47 (0.85–2.53)

 No

118 (21.4%)

434 (76.6%)

1.00

1.00

Ever had sexual intercourse

    

 Yes

56 (42.4%)

76 (57.6%)

3.32 (2.13–4.85)

1.32 (0.61–2.81)

 No

95 (18.6%)

415 (81.4%)

1.00

1.00

Exposed for SRH information

    

 Yes

130 (29.5%)

310 (70.5%)

3.62 (2.2–5.93)

2.11 (1.22–3.66)

 No

21 (10.4%)

181 (89.6%)

1.00

1.00

Discussion of SRH issues

    

 Yes

118 (29.6%)

281 (70.4%)

2.67 (1.74–4.08)

1.13 (0.69–1.87)

 No

33 (13.6%)

210 (86.4%)

1.00

1.00

Perception for SRH risk

    

 Yes

94 (32%)

200 (68%)

2.39 (1.64–3.49)

1.4 (0.91–2.16)

 No

57 (16.4%)

291 (83.6%)

1.00

1.00

Awareness of SRH facility

    

 Yes

118 (32.8%)

242 (67.2%)

3.67 (2.4–5.62)

1.83 (1.12–3.0)

 No

33 (11.7%)

249 (88.3%)

1.00

1.00

Awareness of SRH services

    

 No

18 (8.4%)

196 (91.6%)

1.00

1.00

 Yes

133 (31.1%)

295 (68.9%)

4.9 (2.9–8.29)

2.76 (1.53–4.97)

Distance from Health facility

    

 Short walking

13 (13%)

86 (87%)

1.00

1.00

 Medium

69 (22%)

245 (78%)

1.86 (0.98–3.53)

1.63 (0.81–3.24)

 Very far

69 (30.1%)

160 (69.9%)

2.85 (1.49–5.4 5)

2.28 (1.13–4.62)