Skip to main content

Table 3 Fixed-random effects analysis of predictors of LARCs use among adolescent girls and young women

From: Long-acting reversible contraceptives use among adolescent girls and young women in high fertility countries in sub-Saharan Africa

Variables

Model O

Model I AOR [95% CI]

Model II AOR [95% CI]

Model III AOR [95% CI]

Fixed-effect results

Age of the respondents

 15–19

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 20–24

 

1.16 [0.92,1.45]

 

1.27 [0.99,1.64]

Educational level

 No education

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 Primary

 

0.73* [0.55,0.97]

 

0.9 [0.67,1.23]

 Secondary or higher

 

0.88 [0.67,1.15]

 

0.91 [0.67,1.23]

Marital status

 Never married

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 Married

 

0.96 [0.69,1.32]

 

0.63** [0.45,0.88]

 Cohabiting

 

0.65** [0.47,0.89]

 

0.74 [0.53,1.04]

 Formerly married

 

1.00 [0.63,1.59]

 

1.05 [0.67,1.65]

Current working status

 No

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 Yes

 

1.18 [0.98,1.42]

 

1.13 [0.92,1.39]

Exposure to reading newspaper or magazine

 No

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 Yes

 

0.53*** [0.36,0.77]

 

1.04 [0.70,1.55]

Exposure to listening to radio

 No

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 Yes

 

1.02 [0.83,1.24]

 

1.07 [0.86,1.34]

Exposure to watching television

 No

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 Yes

 

0.97 [0.79,1.21]

 

0.85 [0.66,1.11]

Desire for more children

 Wants more

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 Wants no more

 

1.21 [0.86,1.72]

 

1.56* [1.09,2.26]

 Undecided

 

0.55* [0.32,0.96]

 

0.91 [0.51,1.64]

Parity

    

 Zero birth

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 

1 [1.00,1.00]

 One to three births

 

5.04*** [3.43,7.40]

 

6.42*** [4.27,9.67]

 Four or more births

 

5.44*** [3.08,9.59]

 

7.02*** [3.88,12.67]

Wealth index

    

 Poorest

  

1 [1.00,1.00]

1 [1.00,1.00]

 Poorer

  

0.97 [0.69,1.36]

0.95 [0.67,1.34]

 Middle

  

0.88 [0.62,1.24]

0.92 [0.65,1.31]

 Richer

  

0.80 [0.56,1.14]

0.91 [0.64,1.31]

 Richest

  

0.83 [0.56,1.22]

1.09 [0.72,1.64]

Place of residence

    

 Urban

  

1 [1.00,1.00]

1 [1.00,1.00]

 Rural

  

0.99 [0.75,1.32]

0.94 [0.69,1.28]

Country

 Burkina Faso

  

1 [1.00,1.00]

1 [1.00,1.00]

 Angola

  

0.11*** [0.04,0.28]

0.09*** [0.04,0.24]

 Burundi

  

2.28*** [1.52,3.42]

1.53* [1.00,2.34]

 Gambia

  

5.08*** [2.97,8.69]

3.76*** [2.19,6.48]

 Mali

  

11.64*** [7.86,17.23]

12.22*** [8.10,18.41]

 Mozambique

  

0.65 [0.40,1.05]

0.53* [0.31,0.92]

 Nigeria

  

1.43 [0.96,2.14]

1.85** [1.21,2.84]

 Niger

  

0.32** [0.15,0.70]

0.23*** [0.11,0.50]

 Chad

  

1.19 [0.56,2.52]

1.08 [0.50,2.33]

 Uganda

  

1.43* [1.03,2.01]

1.10 [0.76,1.59]

Random effect results

 PSU variance (95% CI)

0.93 [0.70, 1.24]

0.82 [0.60, 1.12]

0.84 [0.61, 1.15]

0.79 [0.57, 1.10]

 ICC

0.22

0.20

0.20

0.19

 Wald Chi-square

Reference

173.76***

335.52***

459.18***

Model fitness

 Log-likelihood

− 2657.37

− 2492.68

− 2340.47

− 2215.75

 AIC

5818.74

5017.36

4712.94

4491.51

 N

 5834

5834

5834

5834

 Number of clusters

954

954

954

954

  1. Exponentiated coefficients; 95% confidence intervals in brackets; AOR = adjusted odds ratios; CI Confidence Interval; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; 1 [1.00,1.00] = Reference category; PSU = Primary Sampling Unit; ICC = Intra-Class Correlation; AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion