x) Author, Title of the article, Year of publication, Journal, Title of the authors (e.g., midwives, physicians, sociologists, and psychologists) [20] | |
---|---|
1. Ethical dilemmas presented in the article (e.g., fairness, needs, distribution, and access to resources) [15, 21] | |
2. Context of the study (e.g., hospital in DK) (example micro, meso, macro level [17, 27] | |
3. Methodology (e.g., qualitative/quantitative/observation/document analysis) (a) Who is researching what? [18, 19] (b) Empirical material (data) (c) Preunderstanding of the researchers [28] | |
4. Theory (e.g., feminist analysis, content analysis, and grounded theory) [6,7,8, 10, 11] | |
5. The article’s conclusion about the ethical dilemmas [7, 11, 19] | |
6. Gender (a) How is gender conceptualized? [17, 18, 21] (b) Gender = “sex” (men, women, or not defined as either/or) (c) Gender as a social category (how human beings act and react), “race,” binary gender (d) Gender as power relation (Can we find disagreement between, e.g., pregnant women, physicians, or midwives/obstetricians, decision-making and power relations between women and men?) (e) Gender as invisible | |
7. Power dynamics in the article (a) ( e.g., East/West, privileged/unprivileged, discrimination [19] (b) Acceptable/unacceptable practices? (e.g., not acceptable to leave midwives with a fetus that is still alive) [27] (c) Who does the article talk about as the “good” professional, who is the “other” = othering, e.g., fat women for deviating from the norm [29] | |