Community perspectives on family planning service quality among users and non-users: a qualitative study from two cities in Burkina Faso

Table 1 Description of sample of sexually experienced women included in FGD qualitative data collection, Bobo Dioulasso and Banfora, Burkina Faso 2021

Group number	Age group	Marital status	Current use status*	Region of residence	Number of participants
1	15–19	Never married	Non-user	Banfora	9
2	15–19	Never married	Non-user	Banfora	12
3	15–19	Never married	Non-user	Bobo-Dioulasso	9
4	15–19	Never married	Non-user	Bobo-Dioulasso	10
5	15–19	Never married	Current user	Banfora	8
6	15–19	Never married	Current user	Banfora	8
7	15–19	Never married	Current user	Bobo-Dioulasso	9
8	15–19	Never married	Current user	Bobo-Dioulasso	10
9	20–24	Never married	Non-user	Banfora	8
10	20–24	Never married	Non-user	Bobo-Dioulasso	8
11	20–24	Never married	Current user	Banfora	10
12	20–24	Never married	Current user	Bobo-Dioulasso	8
13	15–24	Ever married/in union	Non-user	Banfora	9
14	15–24	Ever married/in union	Non-user	Bobo-Dioulasso	9
15	15–24	Ever married/in union	Current user	Banfora	9
16	15–24	Ever married/in union	Current user	Bobo-Dioulasso	8
17	25–49	Ever married/in union	Non-user	Banfora	12
18	25–49	Ever married/in union	Non-user	Bobo-Dioulasso	11
19	25–49	Ever married/in union	Current user	Banfora	12
20	25–49	Ever married/in union	Current user	Bobo-Dioulasso	11

*Current users of modern method includes using oral contraceptive pill, injectable, implant, and IUD. Women who only reported condom use were considered non-users since this is not a facility-based method. Some non-users had used previously but were not using at the time of the FGD

ISSN: 1742-4755