Skip to main content
Download PDF

Exploring health insurance and knowledge of the ovulatory cycle: evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys of 29 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa

Reproductive Health volume 20, Article number: 129 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Unplanned pregnancy continues to be a major public health concern in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Understanding the ovulatory cycle can help women avoid unplanned pregnancy. Though a wide range of factors for ovulatory cycle knowledge in SSA countries has not been well assessed, the influence of health insurance on ovulatory cycle knowledge is largely unknown. As a result, we set out to investigate the relationship between health insurance enrollment and knowledge of the ovulatory cycle among women of childbearing age. This study aims to investigate the relationship between health insurance enrollment and knowledge of the ovulatory cycle among women of childbearing age in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

Methods

Demographic and Health Surveys (DHSs) data from 29 SSA countries were analyzed. The association between health insurance and ovulatory cycle knowledge was investigated using bivariate and multivariate multilevel logistic regression models among 372,692 women of reproductive age (15–49). The findings were presented as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The pooled result shows that the prevalence of knowledge of ovulatory cycle in the studied 29 SSA countries was 25.5% (95% CI; 24.4%-26.6%). Findings suggest higher odds of ovulatory cycle knowledge among women covered by health insurance (AOR = 1.27, 95% CI; 1.02–1.57), with higher education (higher-AOR = 2.83, 95% CI; 1.95–4.09), from the richest wealth quintile (richest-AOR = 1.39, 95% CI; 1.04–1.87), and from female headed households (AOR = 1.16, 95% CI; 1.01–1.33) compared to women who had no formal education, were from the poorest wealth quintile and belonged to male headed households, respectively. We found lower odds of ovulatory cycle knowledge among women who had 2–4 parity history (AOR = 0.80, 95% CI; 0.65–0.99) compared to those with history of one parity.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that the knowledge of the ovulatory cycle is lacking in SSA. Improving health insurance enrollment should be considered to increase ovulatory cycle knowledge as an approach to reduce the region's unplanned pregnancy rate. Strategies for improving opportunities that contribute to women’s empowerment and autonomy as well as sexual and reproductive health approaches targeting women who are in poorest quintiles, not formally educated, belonging to male headed households, and having high parity should be considered.

Peer Review reports

Background

Fertility awareness is knowing the likelihood of pregnancy during the menstrual cycle [1], being aware of the risks associated with sexual activity, and making decisions about conception for women who are engaging in sexual activity [2]. As a result, knowledge and understanding of a woman's ovulatory cycle is an essential component of fertility awareness for successful pregnancy and family planning [3]. Ovulation is the physiological event when the egg is released from the ovary for potential fertilization—it is the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle during which the chances of pregnancy are greatest [3,4,5]. Indeed, evidence suggests that sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge (i.e., the female reproductive system, fertility awareness, ovulatory cycle) among women and adolescents tends to be limited [6, 7], leading to unmet family planning needs such as unintended and unwanted pregnancies. According to existing literature, women tend to have a poor understanding of their ovulation cycle. For example, in the United States, 33% of women had correct knowledge of their ovulatory cycle [7], whereas in Spain and India, this rate was around 31% [8] and 15%, respectively [9]. In the Africa region, Ethiopia (23%) [10], Kenya (23%), Gambia (23%), Guinea (23%), Sao Tome and Principe (10%), Namibia (14%), Nigeria (20.%), Zambia (22%), and Rwanda (21. %) reported low prevalence of ovulation cycle knowledge [2]. Consequently, a better understanding of ovulation and fertility may help reduce the incidence of unintended pregnancy and associated negative health outcomes, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [11,12,13,14].

Bearack et al. found that, globally, 44% of pregnancies among women aged 15–44 years old were unintended [15], the burden of which lies in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), one study suggested close to 20 million unintended pregnancies take place annually [16] and another estimated a 29% prevalence of unintended pregnancies [16]. A recently published study on determinants of knowledge of ovulatory cycle (KOC) across 29 countries in SSA revealed correct KOC among women was a mere 15.5% [17]. Incidentally, uptake of modern contraceptives (MC) in the region is also low, an estimated 22% in SSA [18]. Studied barriers include lack of provider, availability (i.e., stock), lack of satisfaction with method available, perceived negative attitudes of health workers, cultural norms and a climate of fear around modern contraception use in the SSA region [19,20,21]. A recent systematic review detailed additional reasons for non-use of modern family planning methods that included “fear of side effects, husband’s disapproval, the absence of menses, abstinence, and low perception of risk of pregnancy.” [22]. With low modern contraception uptake and increased likelihood of negative health and social consequences of unintended pregnancies, the importance of reinforcing the understanding and knowledge of natural family planning methods—SRH literacy, fertility awareness, KOC—is emphasized.

The lack of SRH knowledge, literacy, and awareness coupled with low use of modern contraception contributes to negative outcomes such as unwanted or unplanned pregnancies and unsafe abortions, particularly among adolescents and marginalized groups [7, 23,24,25]. Adolescent females are at higher risk of unplanned pregnancies and are more likely to be diagnosed with anemia, have complications and to die during pregnancy [26]. Women who have unintended pregnancies are 20–22% more likely to develop maternal depression and score higher on the parenting stress score [27]. Of the estimated 62.5 million pregnancies in Africa between 2015 and 2019, 43% were unintended, of which, 40% ended in an abortion [28]. With restricted abortion laws, poor quality health services and existing social norms around abortions and unwed mothers, maternal mortality rates due to unsafe abortions remain high in SSA [29]. Although contraception can be considered a comprehensive family planning strategy, its effectiveness as an approach has been called into question with the rise of unintended pregnancy rates and known low uptake in LMICs [16, 30, 31]. As an alternative method to modern family planning, a fertility awareness (i.e., natural family planning) approach such as knowledge of ovulatory cycle (KOC) is being proposed [32].

A recent study investigated the individual and community level determinants of KOC in SSA to inform appropriate strategies to increase knowledge and reduce unwanted or unplanned pregnancies [17]. Knowledge of ovulatory cycle among women of reproductive age was found to be low in the region and varied by country. Women’s age and educational level were the individual-level factors associated with increased knowledge of ovulatory cycle. Several studies have shown the higher likelihood of KOC among women who are educated and wealthy, leading to better SRH outcomes. This highlights the inequities of access to care for socioeconomically disadvantaged women and emphasizes the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 3.8 call to action for universal health coverage (UHC) for all [33].

It is well documented that out-of-pocket payments are the leading approach, and subsequently, a deterrent to accessing health services in SSA [34]. This impacts sub-groups—particularly women and adolescents—who do not have the financial means or decision-making autonomy to seek or access healthcare, resulting in negative social and health outcome [35]. Health insurance schemes—established systems that reduce financial risk of healthcare expenditures—are the vehicles used by governments globally to work towards UHC [36]. There is evidence to suggest that having health insurance is a positive factor in increasing health-related knowledge and seeking of maternal and child health services [37,38,39]. Additionally, both women’s empowerment [40] and household decision-making [41] have been shown to have a positive association with health insurance coverage, suggesting possible opportunities to further investigate women’s health seeking and access to SRH knowledge, awareness and services. Yet the gap between health insurance and knowledge of ovulatory cycle remains unknown. As a result, the purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between health insurance and knowledge of the ovulation cycle in 29 SSA countries. Findings will support the development of specific reproductive health interventions to ensure appropriate ovulatory cycle knowledge among women and in communities. This can help women's health by preventing unwanted pregnancies and associated social and health inequities, especially for those who have limited access to and knowledge of contraceptive methods.

Methods

Data source

Data from 29 nationally representative Demographic Health Surveys (DHS) in SSA were extracted for this study. The DHS Program works closely with national organization in LMICs to collect and monitor demographic and health indicators that tend to be used to inform policy and evidence-based decision making [42]. Included in these demographic surveys are key sexual and reproductive health indicators such as health insurance coverage and knowledge of ovulatory cycle. United States Aids for International Development (USAID) and International Child Fund (ICF) provide financial and technical support to LMICs based on localized need for data collection [43].

For all 29 SSA countries included, a stratified two-stage cluster sampling method was used. In the first stage, Enumeration Areas (EA) was systematically selected from the sampling frame prepared for the most recent and available national population census Subsequently, in the second stage, Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) is used to select a fixed number of households (typically 25–30) [44]. The Individual Recode (IR) file, which was publicly available through DHS Program (https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm) was used for analysis.

Inclusion criteria

A total of 29 countries were included based on the following inclusion criteria: country with latest DHS data available to download between 2010 and 2020, availability of variables of interest (outcome and explanatory), country is located geographically in SSA. Table 1 outlines the year of survey and weighted sample in each included country.

Table 1 Year of survey and weighted sample in each studied country
Full size table

Outcome variable

The outcome variable in this study was women’s correct knowledge of ovulatory cycle. Respondents to the survey were asked, "when is the ovulation time?" and provided with the following six possible response options: "during her period", "after period ended", "middle of the cycle", "before the period begins", "at any time", and "don’t know". This variable was recoded into a binary (dichotomized) variable to be able to complete a regression analysis. If a participate answered correctly—ovulation takes place in “middle of the cycle”—they were coded as '1’; all other responses were incorrect and coded as ‘0’ [10, 45, 46].

Explanatory variables

The key explanatory variable of interest was coverage by health insurance at the time of the survey. Participants were asked if they had either public or private insurance (i.e., social security, employer-based insurance, mutual health organization or community-based insurance, privately purchased commercial insurance). If they indicated they were covered by either public or private insurance, they were coded as “yes”, if they indicated they were not covered by any health insurance, they were coded as “No” [46, 47].

On the basis of epidemiological knowledge and prior evidence [1, 2, 7,8,9,10, 23], we identified potential demographic, socioeconomic and obstetric confounding factors to consider in the model: women’s age (categories: 15–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, 45–49), women’s and husband’s educational level (no formal education, primary school, secondary school, higher)), wealth index (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, richest), currently employed (yes, no), marital status (not married, married), head of household (male, female), parity (one birth, 2–4 births, five and above births), place of residence (urban, rural), distance to health facility (big problem, not a big problem) and media exposure (yes, no). For media exposure, yes was for women who indicated they had at least read a newspaper and/or watched television and/or listened to radio at least once a week; no was if the women indicated they had not accessed any of the three media listed—newspaper, television, or radio—at least once a week.

Statistical analyses

Stata version 14 software was used for the analysis. First, we completed descriptive analysis (i.e., frequencies) of the knowledge of ovulatory cycle (outcome variable) along with the explanatory and confounding variables we were considering for our model; these were presented using tables and graphs. This was followed by a bivariate logistic regression analysis to select candidate control variables at p-value less than 0.05 (p ≤ 0.05). A multicollinearity test using the variance inflation factor (VIF)—Mean VIF = 2.46, Min VIF = 1.03, Max VIF = 5.42—revealed no evidence of collinearity as a VIF less than 10 is tolerable [48]. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted including all explanatory variables that were selected at bivariate analysis, to investigate the association between health insurance coverage and knowledge of ovulatory cycle. Using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test confirmed that the model was fit (p = 0.578). The logistic regression model results were presented using Crude Odds Ratio (COR) and Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) at the 95% Confidence Interval (CI). The “svyset” command was used to consider weight, cluster and strata in DHS’s data sampling methods. The Strengthening of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used in preparation of this manuscript [49].

Ethical considerations

This study uses secondary data analysis to quantitively investigate publicly available DHS data and therefore no ethical approval was required to conduct this work (https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm). Ethical data collection methods and approaches were considered during participant recruitment and survey dissemination by the institutions that funded, commissioned, and managed the surveys. All the DHS surveys used in this study were approved by ICF international and followed the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services rules for respecting of human subject’s rights (refer to http://goo.gl/ny8T6X for more information on protecting the privacy of DHS participants).

Results

Description of study population

A total of 372,692 women of reproductive age (15–49 years) participated in this study. Around 37.0% of those surveyed were between the ages of 15 and 24. Around 59.5% and 22.7% of respondents were rural residents and reported having a difficult time visiting health facilities, respectively. About half of the respondents (50.2%) attended primary school, while 6.9% did not receive formal education. Almost two-fifths (38.5%) of those polled were unemployed (Table 2).

Table 2 Background characteristics of respondents and distribution of ovulatory cycle knowledge across explanatory variables: evidence from 29 SSA countries’ DHS
Full size table

Coverage of health insurance

In the pooled data, approximately 18.1% of women of reproductive age had health insurance. Ghana (62.4%), Gabon (42.6%), and Burundi (21.8%) had the highest coverage, while Burkina Faso (0.5%), Benin (1.0%), and Chad (1.0%) had the lowest coverage (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Coverage of health insurance among women of reproductive age (15–49 years) across 29 SSA countries

Full size image

Prevalence of ovulatory cycle knowledge

The pooled result shows about 25.5% of women in the reproductive age had correct ovulatory cycle knowledge. The highest prevalence was in Congo (57.1%), Gabon (50.4%) and Cameroon (48.1%), while lowest prevalence was seen in Liberia (13.3%), Zimbabwe (14.0%) and Angola (15.5%) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of ovulatory cycle knowledge among women of reproductive age (15–49 years) across 29 SSA countries

Full size image

Distribution of ovulatory cycle knowledge across explanatory and confounding variables

The variation in ovulatory cycle knowledge across the explanatory variable, confounding variables and subgroups is shown in Table 2. Knowledge of the ovulatory cycle ranged from 22.7% among women without health insurance to 38.3% among women with health insurance. Additionally, there was a 31.6% difference in ovulatory cycle knowledge between women who did not attend formal education (16.9%) and women who did (48.5%). Ovulatory cycle knowledge ranged from 17.7% for women from the poorest households to 34.9% for women from the richest households, and from 19.7% among women who had been exposed to media, to 27.1% among women who had not been exposed to media (Table 2).

Health insurance as a predictor of ovulatory cycle knowledge

As shown in Table 3, women with health insurance had a higher likelihood of knowing their ovulatory cycle (AOR = 1.27, 95% CI; 1.02–1.57) than women without health insurance. Furthermore, women who attended secondary school (AOR = 1.72, 95% CI; 1.29–2.31) or higher (AOR = 2.83, 95% CI; 1.95–4.09) were more likely to know the ovulatory cycle than women who did not attend formal education. The results also show that women from the richest households have a higher likelihood of knowing about the ovulatory cycle (AOR = 1.39, 95% CI; 1.04–1.87) than women from the poorest households. Women from female-headed households had a higher likelihood of knowing about the ovulatory cycle (AOR = 1.16, 95% CI; 1.01–1.33) than women from male-headed households. However, women with higher parity (2–4 births) had lower odds of ovulatory cycle knowledge (AOR = 0.80, 95% CI; 0.65–0.99) than those with one parity.

Table 3 Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression results for association between health insurance and ovulatory cycle knowledge among reproductive age women in SSA: evidence from 29 SSA countries’ DHS
Full size table

Discussion

The association between health insurance and knowledge of the ovulatory cycle among reproductive-aged women was investigated in this study using nationally representative data from 29 SSA countries. The pooled results show that approximately 25.5% (95% CI; 24.4%–26.6%) of reproductive-age women were aware of the ovulatory cycle. This finding is lower than a previous study among young women in SSA, which found that 49% of young women had correct ovulation knowledge [2]. This could be because the previous study only included young women (15–24 years) [2] while our study included all women of reproductive age (15–49 years), and young women tend to have better health knowledge [50]. Additionally, there was a difference in prevalence of knowledge of the ovulatory cycle observed among the 29 SSA countries. One possible explanation for the variation within SSA is the countries’ health literacy levels. Evidence suggests that health literacy can be effective and improve population level awareness [51]. Some low and middle income countries (LMICs) have implemented innovative health literacy approaches and demonstrated exemplar outcomes that improved health related knowledge, however, these are varied and depend on local or national government investments [51], which are at the will of political powers. Additionally, health literacy in Africa is positively associated with higher education, wealth, and living in urban areas [52]. Sub-Saharan African countries will accordingly vary in their national or local education, wealth status and population living in urban versus rural regions, all of which influence and explain differing population health literacy levels across countries in the region.

Findings revealed that women with health insurance were more likely to know about the ovulatory cycle than women with no health insurance. There is little evidence to support this finding, however evidence exists on lower health literacy being associated with avoiding seeking health services [53]. Women with health insurance tend to have more contacts with health services and health personnel, and more likely to be exposed to reproductive health information and education [53]. Education and wealth status have been shown to be positively associated with having health insurance coverage in SSA [54, 55] which are also highly correlated with health literacy [52]. Evidence suggests that children, adolescents, women, and other family members in insured households are more likely to receive health services, be informed about health-related knowledge, and are healthier than those in uninsured households [37]. Several studies have also found that women and children who are uninsured or have inadequate health insurance coverage, are less likely to visit health facilities and access health information, preventive, curative, and other care and support health services [38, 56]. Although education, economic, social, cultural, and geographical barriers to healthcare must be addressed, affordable health insurance can be part of the solution as countries work towards universal health coverage [57, 58].

In this study, women's educational level was related to their knowledge of the ovulatory cycle. This finding was consistent with a systematic review conducted by Pedro et al. [59] and studies conducted in Uganda [60] and Ethiopia [61]. It is possible that higher education allows students to learn more about the physiology of reproduction and health related knowledge [10]. Various educational approaches aimed at increasing fertility awareness are currently being developed and researched. For example, a pre-post interventional study in Canada found that fertility education websites can raise a person’s fertility awareness [62]. Another study in Rwanda found that an entertainment-education serial radio drama raised fertility awareness [63].

Similar to a previous study in Ethiopia, women from the richest households had a higher likelihood of knowing about the ovulatory cycle than women from the poorest households [10]. As Tucker-Drob and Briley suggest, adolescents belonging to higher socioeconomic status (SES) (wealthier quintiles) can pursue interest and knowledge as compared to individuals who are of lower SES, restricting their knowledge base [64].

Women from female-headed households (FHH) had higher odds of knowing about the ovulatory cycle than women from male-headed households (MHH). There are several factors that influence effective communication of sexual and reproductive health issues between parents and their adolescents in Africa. Gender, religious and cultural norms exist that are barriers to communication, particularly between male parents and their daughters [65]. Reasons for these barriers include embarrassment of the topic, taboo and unaccepted topic, cultural and religious beliefs around sexual health or thinking adolescents are too young to understand the concepts, they lead to sexual and reproductive health information and education gaps [65] A recent scoping review by Agbeve et al., detailed the gendered trends of sexual and reproductive health communication between adolescents and their parents. They highlighting that mothers preferred discussing SRH topics with their daughters, while fathers with their sons, further indicating that mothers, more than fathers, tended to be the “sex educator” for both genders, and cultural norms dictated that fathers were not expected to communicate with their daughters on sexuality related issues [66]. This explains the increased likelihood that FHH had higher odds of knowing about the ovulatory cycle than MHH. Additionally, several studies have found that resources under women's control are more likely to be allocated for beneficial purposes that promote family well-being than resources under men's control [67], which influence increased likelihood of access to health related services and/or education. In recent history, traditional family norms are evolving and new household orientations beyond male-dominated households are emerging as more common, with FHH becoming a more visible phenomenon globally [68]. According to Milazzo, Anamaria, and Dominique Van de Walle, the prevalence of FHH in Africa has grown and poverty among FHH has been declining at a faster rate since 1990. It is possible that previously poor FHH have leveraged new opportunities created by recent economic growth in Africa, as well as benefited from the expanded social protection in the region [69].

In our study, women with a parity of 2–4 births had lower odds of knowing their ovulatory cycle than women with a parity of one birth. There is evidence to suggest that poor ovulatory cycle knowledge and harmful social norms among older and high parity women in LMICs are possible explanations for this phenomenon [2, 70]. To improve ovulatory knowledge and prevent unintended pregnancy among those groups of women, communication resources for social and behavioral change that combine technical guidance with specific material for customers and providers must be considered [70].

Implications of study findings

To the authors’ knowledge, no other study has investigated the association between health insurance coverage and knowledge of ovulatory cycle to inform policies or programs aimed at sexual and reproductive health (SRH), particularly family planning in LMICs. Findings from this work are new and have potential policy and program implications. The observed positive association between health insurance and ovulation knowledge supports the movement towards universal health coverage (UHC). Many LMICs have low uptake of modern contraception for a myriad of reasons ranging from lack of local stock, financial and cost barriers, and issues related to fear surrounding contraceptive use [18, 20]. This places many women, particularly adolescents, at higher risk of unmet need for family planning (i.e., unwanted or unplanned pregnancies) and associated negative health and socioeconomic inequities [71, 72]. As countries continue to work towards United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.8—achieving universal health coverage—there is potential to contribute to increased SRH education, knowledge, and awareness among women, guiding reproductive decisions and reducing likelihood of unmet needs for family planning. Relatedly, previous work has found a positive association between women’s empowerment [40] as well as household decision making autonomy with coverage by health insurance [41] in Africa. Focusing on strategies and improving opportunities that contribute to women’s empowerment and autonomy may result in a positive effect on health coverage and knowledge of ovulation cycle. Additionally, SRH programs and approaches in SSA should target women who are in poorest quintiles, not formally educated, belong to male headed households, and have more than two births.

Strengths and limitations

The association between health insurance and knowledge of the ovulatory cycle among women of reproductive age in 29 SSA countries was investigated using a large nationally representative sample. To the authors’ knowledge, no other study has investigated this association; findings have provided a basis to further investigate the pathways of how having health insurance in LMICs can work to protect against unintended/unplanned pregnancies in contexts where modern contraception is either not used/accepted or cannot be easily accessed. Nonetheless, some limitations need to be mentioned. First, because the study is cross-sectional, a causal-effect relationship cannot be established. Second, the DHS relied on self-reported data, which could be biased by recall. Third, contraceptive use or method was not included in the model knowing the low use of contraception in the region [18]. The focus was on the association between having health insurance and KOC, in an attempt to contribute to advancing the movement for universal health coverage while considering cultural norms/attitudes and availability of modern contraception. We acknowledge that this exclusion may limit the scope of our study and may not account for the full spectrum of factors influencing ovulatory cycle knowledge. Finally, due to data availability and constraints, we relied on surveys conducted at various points in the selected countries.

Conclusion

The study found that knowledge of the ovulatory cycle was low among reproductive-age women in SSA, and health insurance had a positive relationship with knowledge of the ovulatory cycle. Additionally, women with higher education and wealth status as well as living in female-headed households were more likely to have knowledge of the ovulatory cycle, whereas parity (i.e., more than two births) had a negative association. Strategies for improving opportunities that contribute to women’s empowerment and autonomy as well as sexual and reproductive health approaches targeting women who are in poorest quintiles, not formally educated, belonging to male headed households, and having high parity should be considered.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

References

  1. Hampton K, Mazza D. Fertility-awareness knowledge, attitudes and practices of women attending general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2015;44(11):840–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iyanda AE, Dinkins BJ, Osayomi T, Adeusi TJ, Lu Y, Oppong JR. Fertility knowledge, contraceptive use and unintentional pregnancy in 29 African countries: a cross-sectional study. Int J Public Health. 2020;65(4):445–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Babbar K, Dev P. Modelling the impact of Ovulatory Cycle Knowledge on the number of children and age of women at first birth.

  4. Holesh JE, Bass AN, Lord M. Physiology, Ovulation. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441996/.

  5. American Pregnancy Association (ASA). American Pregnancy Association. 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. What is Ovulation? Available from: https://americanpregnancy.org/getting-pregnant/infertility/understanding-ovulation/.

  6. Finlay JE, Assefa N, Mwanyika-Sando M, Dessie Y, Harling G, Njau T, et al. Sexual and reproductive health knowledge among adolescents in eight sites across sub-Saharan Africa. Tropical Med Int Health. 2020;25(1):44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harmanli O, Ilarslan I, Kirupananthan S, Knee A, Harmanli A. Women’s perceptions about female reproductive system: a survey from an academic obstetrics and gynecology practice. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(6):1219–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. García D, Vassena R, Prat A, Vernaeve V. Increasing fertility knowledge and awareness by tailored education: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32(1):113–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahey R, Gupta M, Kandpal S, Malhotra N, Vanamail P, Singh N, et al. Fertility awareness and knowledge among Indian women attending an infertility clinic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):177.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dagnew B, Teshale AB, Dagne H, Diress M, Tesema GA, Dewau R, et al. Individual and community-level determinants of knowledge of ovulatory cycle among women of childbearing age in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis based on 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(9): e0254094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandra-Mouli V, McCarraher DR, Phillips SJ, Williamson NE, Hainsworth G. Contraception for adolescents in low and middle income countries: needs, barriers, and access. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ba DM, Ssentongo P, Agbese E, Kjerulff KH. Prevalence and predictors of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in 17 sub-Saharan African countries: a large population-based study. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019;21:26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blackstone SR, Nwaozuru U, Iwelunmor J. Factors influencing contraceptive use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2017;37(2):79–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalamar AM, Tunçalp Ö, Hindin MJ. Developing strategies to address contraceptive needs of adolescents: exploring patterns of use among sexually active adolescents in 46 low- and middle-income countries. Contraception. 2018;98(1):36–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Alkema L, Sedgh G. Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(4):e380–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ameyaw EK, Budu E, Sambah F, Baatiema L, Appiah F, Seidu AA, et al. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country analysis of demographic and health surveys. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8): e0220970.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zegeye B, Adjei NK, Idriss-Wheeler D, Yaya S. Individual and community-level determinants of knowledge of ovulatory cycle among women of reproductive age in 29 African countries: a multilevel analysis. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22(1):394.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Boadu I. Coverage and determinants of modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa: further analysis of demographic and health surveys. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Negash WD, Belachew TB, Asmamaw DB, Bitew DA. Four in ten married women demands satisfied by modern contraceptives in high fertility sub-Saharan Africa countries: a multilevel analysis of demographic and health surveys. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):2169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ndayizigiye M, Fawzi MCS, Lively CT, Ware NC. Understanding low uptake of contraceptives in resource-limited settings: a mixed-methods study in rural Burundi. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kyilleh JM, Tabong PTN, Konlaan BB. Adolescents’ reproductive health knowledge, choices and factors affecting reproductive health choices: a qualitative study in the West Gonja District in Northern region, Ghana. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018;18(1):6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gahungu J, Vahdaninia M, Regmi PR. The unmet needs for modern family planning methods among postpartum women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the literature. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Thijssen A, Meier A, Panis K, Ombelet W. ‘Fertility Awareness-Based Methods’ and subfertility: a systema­tic review. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6(3):113–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ajayi AI, Odunga SA, Oduor C, Ouedraogo R, Ushie BA, Wado YD. “I was tricked”: understanding reasons for unintended pregnancy among sexually active adolescent girls. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. de la Calle M, Bartha JL, Lopez CM, Turiel M, Martinez N, Arribas SM, et al. Younger age in adolescent pregnancies is associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Prakash R, Singh A, Pathak PK, Parasuraman S. Early marriage, poor reproductive health status of mother and child well-being in India. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011;37(3):136–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bahk J, Yun SC, Kim Y, Khang YH. Impact of unintended pregnancy on maternal mental health: a causal analysis using follow up data of the Panel Study on Korean Children (PSKC). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Guttmacher Institute. Guttmacher Institute. 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 16]. Unintended Pregnancy and Abortion in Africa. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/unintended-pregnancy-and-abortion-africa.

  29. Gebremedhin M, Semahegn A, Usmael T, Tesfaye G. Unsafe abortion and associated factors among reproductive aged women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Srinivasan M, White A. Outcomes and economic burden of hormonal contraceptive failure in developing countries: a case for improving effectiveness? 2019 Mar 5 [cited 2023 Mar 13]; Available from: https://unthsc-ir.tdl.org/handle/20.500.12503/27187.

  31. Polis CB, Bradley SEK, Bankole A, Onda T, Croft T, Singh S. Typical-use contraceptive failure rates in 43 countries with Demographic and Health Survey data: summary of a detailed report. Contraception. 2016;94(1):11–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pallone SR, Bergus GR. Fertility awareness-based methods: another option for family planning. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(2):147–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. World Health Organization (WHO). Targets of Sustainable Development Goal 3 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/about-us/our-work/sustainable-development-goals/targets-of-sustainable-development-goal-3.

  34. Frimpong AO, Amporfu E, Arthur E. Effects of public and external health spending on out-of-pocket payments for healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa. Health Policy Plan. 2022;37(9):1129–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Osamor PE, Grady C. Women’s autonomy in health care decision-making in developing countries: a synthesis of the literature. Int J Womens Health. 2016;7(8):191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Atim C, Bhushan I, Blecher M, Gandham R, Rajan V, Davén J, et al. Health financing reforms for Universal Health Coverage in five emerging economies. J Glob Health. 2021;11:16005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. American Hospital Association (AHA). Report: The Importance of Health Coverage [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.aha.org/guidesreports/report-importance-health-coverage.

  38. Garfield R, Orgera K, Jan 25 ADP, 2019. The Uninsured and the ACA: A Primer – Key Facts about Health Insurance and the Uninsured amidst Changes to the Affordable Care Act [Internet]. KFF. 2019 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.kff.org/uninsured/report/the-uninsured-and-the-aca-a-primer-key-facts-about-health-insurance-and-the-uninsured-amidst-changes-to-the-affordable-care-act/.

  39. Ugbor KI, Agbutun AS, Ugbor-Kalu UJ. Investigating the influence of community health insurance on health seeking behaviors and demand for maternal healthcare services in Nigeria. J Public Aff. 2022;22(4): e2708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kawuki J, Gatasi G, Sserwanja Q. Women empowerment and health insurance utilisation in Rwanda: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22(1):378.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zegeye B, Idriss-Wheeler D, Ahinkorah BO, Ameyaw EK, Seidu AA, Adjei NK, et al. Association between women’s household decision-making autonomy and health insurance enrollment in sub-Sahara Africa: evidence from Demographic and Health Survey data of 29 countries. BMC Public Health. 2023.

  42. The Demographic Health Survey Program. The DHS Program - Methodology [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/Methodology/.

  43. The Demographic Health Survey Program. The DHS Program - Quality information to plan, monitor and improve population, health, and nutrition programs [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/.

  44. The Demographic Health Survey Program. Analyzing DHS Data [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/data/Guide-to-DHS-Statistics/Analyzing_DHS_Data.htm.

  45. Institute for Reproductive Health. Institute for Reproductive Health. 2013 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. A Comprehensive Literature Review: Fertility Awareness Across the Life Course. Available from: https://www.irh.org/resource-library/a-comprehensive-literature-review-fertility-awareness-across-the-life-course/.

  46. Croft T, Marhsall AMJ, Courtney K. Allen, et al. Guide to DHS Statistics [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/data/Guide-to-DHS-Statistics/index.cfm.

  47. Aboagye RG, Okyere J, Ahinkorah BO, Seidu AA, Zegeye B, Amu H, et al. Health insurance coverage and timely antenatal care attendance in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings. USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1995. p. 745.

    Google Scholar 

  49. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yin Z, Geng G, Lan X, Zhang L, Wang S, Zang Y, et al. Status and determinants of health behavior knowledge among the elderly in China: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):710.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Meherali S, Punjani NS, Mevawala A. Health literacy interventions to improve health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. Health Lit Res Pract. 2020;4(4):e251–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. McClintock HF, Alber JM, Schrauben SJ, Mazzola CM, Wiebe DJ. Constructing a measure of health literacy in Sub-Saharan African countries. Health Promot Int. 2020;35(5):907–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tipirneni R, Politi MC, Kullgren JT, Kieffer EC, Goold SD, Scherer AM. Association between health insurance literacy and avoidance of health care services owing to cost. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(7): e184796.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Amu H, Dickson KS, Adde KS, Kissah-Korsah K, Darteh EKM, Kumi-Kyereme A. Prevalence and factors associated with health insurance coverage in urban sub-Saharan Africa: multilevel analyses of demographic and health survey data. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3): e0264162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Barasa E, Kazungu J, Nguhiu P, Ravishankar N. Examining the level and inequality in health insurance coverage in 36 sub-Saharan African countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(4): e004712.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Health Insurance Status and Its Consequences. America’s Uninsured Crisis: Consequences for Health and Health Care [Internet]. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK214966/.

  57. Call KT, McAlpine DD, Garcia CM, Shippee N, Beebe T, Adeniyi TC, et al. Barriers to care in an ethnically diverse publicly insured population: is health care reform enough? Med Care. 2014;52(8):720–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Douthit N, Kiv S, Dwolatzky T, Biswas S. Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health. 2015;129(6):611–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pedro J, Brandão T, Schmidt L, Costa ME, Martins MV. What do people know about fertility? A systematic review on fertility awareness and its associated factors. Ups J Med Sci. 2018;123(2):71–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Skirbekk V, Samir KC. Fertility-reducing dynamics of women’s social status and educational attainment. Asian Popul Stud. 2012;8(3):251–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Getahun MB, Nigatu AG. Knowledge of the ovulatory period and associated factors among reproductive women in Ethiopia: a population-based study using the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey. Int J Womens Health. 2020;8(12):701–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Daniluk JC, Koert E. Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):353–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Shelus V, VanEnk L, Giuffrida M, Jansen S, Connolly S, Mukabatsinda M, et al. Understanding your body matters: effects of an entertainment-education serial radio drama on fertility awareness in Rwanda. J Health Commun. 2018;23(8):761–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Tucker-Drob EM, Briley DA. Socioeconomic status modifies interest-knowledge associations among adolescents. Pers Individ Dif. 2012;53(1):9–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Motsomi K, Makanjee C, Basera T, Nyasulu P. Factors affecting effective communication about sexual and reproductive health issues between parents and adolescents in zandspruit informal settlement, Johannesburg, South Africa. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;27(25):120.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Agbeve AS, Fiaveh DY, Anto-Ocrah M. Parent–adolescent sexuality communication in the African context: a scoping review of the literature. Sex Med Rev. 2022;10(4):554–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Phiri O. Empower Women - Female headed households responding to poverty and suffering. [Internet]. EmpowerWomen. 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.empowerwomen.org/en/community/discussions/2015/10/female-headed-households-responding-to-poverty-and-suffering.

  68. Zarhani SH. Empowerment of Female headed households | socialsciences.in [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from: http://www.socialsciences.in/article/empowerment-female-headed-households.

  69. Milazzo A, van de Walle D. Women Left Behind? 2015 Jun [cited 2023 Mar 13]; Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22212.

  70. Ndiaye K, Portillo E, Ouedraogo D, Mobley A, Babalola S. High-risk advanced maternal age and high parity pregnancy: tackling a neglected need through formative research and action. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018;6(2):372–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Alie MS, Abebe GF, Negesse Y. Magnitude and determinants of unmet need for family planning among reproductive age women in East Africa: multilevel analysis of recent demographic and health survey data. Contracep Reprod Med. 2022;7(1):2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Guttmacher Institute. Guttmacher Institute. 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 14]. Costs and Benefits of Contraceptives|Africa. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/regions/africa.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Demographic and Health Surveys Program for making the DHS data available, and we thank the women who participated in the surveys.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. HaSET Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Betregiorgis Zegeye

  2. Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

    Dina Idriss-Wheeler

  3. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Public Health, Walter Sisulu University, Eastern Cape, Mthatha, South Africa

    Olanrewaju Oladimeji

  4. School of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

    Sanni Yaya

  5. The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Sanni Yaya

Authors
  1. Betregiorgis Zegeye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dina Idriss-Wheeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Olanrewaju Oladimeji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sanni Yaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SY contributed to the conception and design of the study. BZ conducted the data analysis. DIW and OO assisted with data analysis and provided technical support in interpretation of results. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript for its intellectual content, as well as read the drafts and approved the final version. SY had final responsibility to submit.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanni Yaya.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was not required since the data is available to the public domain.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Dr. Sanni Yaya is an Editor-in-Chief of Reproductive Health and was not involved in the peer-review or handling of the manuscript. The authors have no other competing interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zegeye, B., Idriss-Wheeler, D., Oladimeji, O. et al. Exploring health insurance and knowledge of the ovulatory cycle: evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys of 29 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Reprod Health 20, 129 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01675-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01675-z

Keywords

Reproductive Health

ISSN: 1742-4755