Skip to main content

Peer-review policy

Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help Editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. You can read more about the peer-review process here.

Reproductive Health operates an open peer-review system, where the reviewers' names are included on the peer review reports for authors. In addition, if the article is published, the named reviewer reports are published online alongside the article under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. Previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

The benefit of open peer review is that it increases transparency. The peer reviewers and Editors are fully accountable for the decisions made, bias is reduced as reviewer reports are named, published reports can serve an educational purpose in helping facilitate training and research into peer review, and reviewers can get credit for their work.

Annual Journal Metrics

  • 2022 Citation Impact
    3.4 - 2-year Impact Factor
    4.2 - 5-year Impact Factor
    1.657 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
    1.093 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

    2023 Speed
    18 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median)
    166 days submission to accept (Median)

    2023 Usage 
    3,031,937 downloads
    1,524 Altmetric mentions

Reaction to the 2024 Alabama Supreme Court ruling on IVF

Read the blog by Gwendolyn P. Quinn & Laura Kimberly on the Alabama Supreme Court ruling on IVF and what it means for women with cancer.

Engaging with African feminist interpretations of the Maternal

Read the blog by Ogochukwu Udenigwe on interpretations of motherhood and its relationship with patriarchal culture among African feminists.