Peer Review reports
From: Idiopathic isolated clitoromegaly: A report of two cases
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 19 Jul 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Eray Copcu |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Jul 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 24 Aug 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Eray Copcu |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 29 Sep 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Eray Copcu |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 29 Sep 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 1 Oct 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Eray Copcu |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 1 Oct 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Oct 2004 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Oct 2004 | Article published | 10.1186/1742-4755-1-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.