Skip to main content

Table 4 Binary logistic regression analysis of respondent’s future fertility intention (N = 300)

From: Effect of gender preference on fertility: cross-sectional study among women of Tharu community from rural area of eastern region of Nepal

Future plan of child birth

Independent variables

Unadjusted OR

CI

Adjusted OR

CI

Having desire for more children

Age of the respondents

15–24

10.892**

4.754–24.956

2.650

0.767–9.156

25–34

4.667**

2.089–10.425

2.185

0.730–6.545

35–49R

    

Education of the respondents

Illiterate

0.145**

0.056–0.373

0.889

0.413–1.915

Primary

0.353**

0.194–0.642

0.599

0.168–2.140

Secondary and aboveR

    

Sex composition

Only male

9.545**

3.133–29.082

3.577

0.726–17.634

Only female

34.650**

11.725–102.401

10.153*

2.357–43.732

Both male and femaleR

    

Sex of the last child

Female

3.286

1.844–5.853

1.740

0.328–9.215

MaleR

    

No. of children

1

13.057**

4.448–38.329

2.472

0.544–11.238

2

1.317

0.396–4.380

0.806

0.206–3.159

  

≥3 R

    
  1. *Significance p < 0.05, **Significance p < 0.001.
  2. R = Reference.
  3. The reference category is NOT having desire of more children.
  4. Hosmer and Lemeshow test was used to find out fit of model. It has been found that this model predicts significantly better χ2 (8) = 1.858, p >0.05 = 0.985.