Skip to main content

Table 7 Productivity and citation analysis of top ten productive institutions/organizations on FGM/C (1930 – 2015)

From: Bibliometric analysis of literature on female genital mutilation: (1930 – 2015)

SCRa

Institutionb (country affiliation)

Frequency (%) N = 1035

TC

C/A

h-index

HCA

1st

Karolinska Institutet (Sweden)

16 (1.55)

226

14.13

8

4 (25.00)

2nd

King's College London (UK)

14 (1.35)

96

6.86

5

1 (7.14)

3rd

UCL (UK)

13 (1.26)

63

4.85

5

0 (0.0)

4th

Hopitaux universitaires de Geneve (Switzerland)

12 (1.16)

61

5.08

3

1 (8.33)

5th

Universiteit Gent (Belgium)

11 (1.06)

98

8.91

6

1 (9.09)

6th

King Abdulaziz University (KSA)

9 (0.87)

117

13.00

5

2 (22.22)

6th

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (UK)

9 (0.87)

82

9.11

5

1 (11.11)

6th

University of Washington Seattle (USA)

9 (0.87)

203

22.56

7

3 (33.33)

9th

Universitetet i Oslo (Norway)

8 (0.77)

126

15.75

6

2 (25.0)

9th

Brigham and Women’s Hospital (USA)

8 (0.77)

113

14.13

5

2 (25.0)

9th

Organisation Mondiale de la Sante (WHO)

8 (0.77)

79

9.88

4

2 (25.0)

  1. FGM/C: female genital mutilation/cutting
  2. Abbreviations: SCR: Standard competition ranking: TC: total citations. C/A: number of citations per article calculated by dividing the total number of citations retrieved for each year by the total number of publications in that year. h-index: Hirsch index. HCA: highly cited articles (those with ≥ 20 citations).
  3. UCL: University College London
  4. aSCR: Standard competition ranking. Equal countries were given the same ranking number, and then a gap is left in the ranking numbers.
  5. bNames of institutions were written the same way they appeared in Scopus.