Location and content of counselling and acceptance of postpartum IUD in Sri Lanka

Table 3 Determinants of PPIUD insertion

VARIABLES	PPIUD insertion	PPIUD insertion	PPIUD insertion
PPIUD Positive Quality Indicators
Could mention at least one risk?		0.133***	0.0473***
Could mention at least one risk?		(0.0526)	(0.0203)
Client informed about alternatives?		0.215***	0.674
Client informed about alternatives?		(0.0893)	(0.300)
Client given opportunity to ask questions?		1.321*	1.220
Client given opportunity to ask questions?		(0.189)	(0.180)
Given PPIUD information leaflet?		8.367***	5.633***
Given PPIUD information leaflet?		(1.064)	(0.768)
PPIUD Negative Quality Indicators
Could not mention at least one benefit?		1.58e-07***	7.92e-08***
Could not mention at least one benefit?		(3.52e-08)	(2.36e-08)
Dissatisfaction with PPIUD counselling?		0.0242***	0.0485***
Dissatisfaction with PPIUD counselling?		(0.0245)	(0.0487)
Counselling Location
Home	0.160***		0.184***
Home	(0.0271)		(0.0278)
Field Clinic	0.173***		0.152***
Field Clinic	(0.0231)		(0.0179)
Hospital Clinic	1.931***		0.975
Hospital Clinic	(0.200)		(0.0942)
Hospital Ward	4.372***		2.139***
Hospital Ward	(0.441)		(0.219)
Observations	12971	12316	12295

*** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1
Notes: The unit of observation is a woman. Incidence rate ratios are presented with robust standard errors in the parentheses below. Results are from a modified Poisson regression that includes age, parity, and hospital controls. Regressions are also weighted by the inverse of the proportion sampled in order to correct for the fact that enumerators failed to collect information for around 14.3% of the total number of deliveries across the four hospitals. Counselling received is whether counselling was received at this location type or not. Information on PPIUD is whether the respondent received the information on this element of counselling or not

ISSN: 1742-4755