Peer Review reports
From: Breaking bad news in assisted reproductive technology: a proposal for guidelines
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Jan 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sofia Gameiro |
| 9 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Reed |
| 22 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carol Seifart |
| 5 Mar 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Debbie Payne |
| 22 Mar 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniela Leone |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Mar 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Mar 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Reed |
| 10 May 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniela Leone |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 May 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 May 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carol Seifart |
| 14 Jun 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniela Leone |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Jun 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 28 Jun 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniela Leone |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 28 Jun 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Jul 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Jul 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12978-017-0350-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.