Skip to main content

Table 4 Changes in probability of reporting future intent to deliver in a health facility (facility group only) N = 130

From: Modeling the relationship between women’s perceptions and future intention to use institutional maternity care in the Western Highlands of Guatemala

Variable

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

(Determinants of intention/controls)

(Access to institutional care)

(Perceived need)

(Satisfaction)

(Disrespect & abuse)

Municipality

 1 = Nebaj, 0 = Cotzal/ Chajul

−0.270**

−0.262**

−0.334***

−0.324**

−0.312**

Language

 1 = indigenous, 0 = Spanish

−0.248***

−0.254***

−0.221***

−0.225***

−0.231***

Parity

 1 = (6-15), 0 = (0-5)

−0.117

−0.105

−0.060

−0.035

−0.044

Education

 1 = some, 0 = none

0.152

0.158

0.099

0.106

0.108

Age

0.012

0.011

0.006

0.007

0.008

Birth Type

 1 = vaginal, 0 = C-section

−0.036

−0.039

−0.075

−0.069

−0.078

Distance

 1 = proximate, 0 = distal

 

0.040

0.051

0.048

0.051

Wealth

 

−0.014

−0.002

−0.002

−0.001

Willingness to recommend a facility birth to others

 1 = yes, 0 = no

  

0.557***

0.559***

0.548***

Satisfaction w/last birth

 1 = very good/good, 0 = average to very poor

   

0.140

0.097

Experienced D&A

 1 = yes to at least one of the 3 items

    

−0.107

Df

6

8

9

10

11

Model Diff Chi2

 

0.29

18.50***

0.88

0.83

Models compared

 

(1&2)

(2&3)

(3&4)

(4&5)

  1. Source: Compiled by author using COTONEB survey data
  2. *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.010