Skip to main content

Table 4 Changes in probability of reporting future intent to deliver in a health facility (facility group only) N = 130

From: Modeling the relationship between women’s perceptions and future intention to use institutional maternity care in the Western Highlands of Guatemala

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
(Determinants of intention/controls) (Access to institutional care) (Perceived need) (Satisfaction) (Disrespect & abuse)
Municipality
 1 = Nebaj, 0 = Cotzal/ Chajul
−0.270** −0.262** −0.334*** −0.324** −0.312**
Language
 1 = indigenous, 0 = Spanish
−0.248*** −0.254*** −0.221*** −0.225*** −0.231***
Parity
 1 = (6-15), 0 = (0-5)
−0.117 −0.105 −0.060 −0.035 −0.044
Education
 1 = some, 0 = none
0.152 0.158 0.099 0.106 0.108
Age 0.012 0.011 0.006 0.007 0.008
Birth Type
 1 = vaginal, 0 = C-section
−0.036 −0.039 −0.075 −0.069 −0.078
Distance
 1 = proximate, 0 = distal
  0.040 0.051 0.048 0.051
Wealth   −0.014 −0.002 −0.002 −0.001
Willingness to recommend a facility birth to others
 1 = yes, 0 = no
   0.557*** 0.559*** 0.548***
Satisfaction w/last birth
 1 = very good/good, 0 = average to very poor
    0.140 0.097
Experienced D&A
 1 = yes to at least one of the 3 items
     −0.107
Df 6 8 9 10 11
Model Diff Chi2   0.29 18.50*** 0.88 0.83
Models compared   (1&2) (2&3) (3&4) (4&5)
  1. Source: Compiled by author using COTONEB survey data
  2. *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.010