Skip to main content

Table 2 Determinants of having sex with neither condom nor contraception in boys: bivariate analysis

From: Contraception determinants in youths of Sierra Leone are largely behavioral

Variable (n = 194 unless otherwise specified)

Boys

n (%)

% neither condom nor contraception

Crude OR (95%CI)

P

Age (years)

   

0.519a

 10–14

15 (7.7%)

46.7%

1.33 (0.44–4.00)

 

 15–19

96 (49.5%)

43.8%

1.18 (0.65–2.14)

 20–24

83 (42.8%)

39.8%

1

Province

   

< 0.001

 Eastern

61 (31.0%)

54.1%

6.33 (2.56–15.69)

 

 Northern

82 (42.3%)

50.0%

5.38 (2.25–12.83)

 Southern

51 (26.3%)

15.7%

1

Distance to school (n = 191)

   

0.004

  < 30 min

142 (74.3%)

35.9%

1

 

 ≥ 30 min

49 (25.7%)

59.2%

2.59 (1.33–5.03)

Distance to health facility (n = 191)

   

0.031

  < 30 min

94 (49.2%)

34.0%

1

 

 ≥ 30 min

97 (50.8%)

49.5%

1.90 (1.06–3.40)

Education

   

< 0.001a

 None

31 (16.0%)

71.0%

6.26 (2.54–15.44)

 

 Primary attended

74 (38.1%)

47.3%

2.30 (1.20–4.40)

 Primary completed or superior

89 (45.9%)

28.1%

1

Literacy

   

< 0.001

 Cannot read/only parts

47 (24.2%)

72.3%

5.39 (2.61–11.15)

 

 Able to read

147 (75.8%)

32.7%

1

Source water* (n = 191)

   

0.058

 Unimproved

92 (48.2%)

48.9%

1.75 (0.98–3.13)

 

 Improved

99 (51.8%)

35.4%

1

Size of household (n = 193)

   

0.133

 1–5

48 (24.8%)

45.8%

1.63 (0.79–3.37)

 

 6–8

85 (44.0%)

34.1%

1

 ≥ 9

60 (31.0%)

50.0%

1.93 (0.98–3.80)

Profession head (n = 191)

   

0.257

 Farmer

120 (62.8%)

45.0%

1.42 (0.78–2.59)

 

 Other

71 (37.2%)

36.6%

1

Met VPE

   

0.016

 No

94 (48.5%)

51.1%

2.02 (1.14–3.61)

 

 Yes

100 (51.5%)

34.0%

1

Met enhanced CAG

   

0.660

 No

152 (78.4%)

41.5%

0.86 (0.43–1.70)

 

 Yes

42 (21.6%)

45.2%

1

Negotiation (condom & refusal)

   

< 0.001a

 Neither option

60 (30.9%)

60.0%

4.83 (2.31–10.12)

 

 One out of two options

58 (29.9%)

48.3%

3.01 (1.44–6.29)

 Both options

76 (39.2%)

23.7%

1

Age at 1st sex (years)

   

0.340

  < 15

69 (35.6%)

49.3%

1.55 (0.81–3.00)

 

 15

47 (24.2%)

38.3%

0.99 (0.47–2.09)

 16–24

78 (40.2%)

38.5%

1

Lifetime partners (n = 192)

   

< 0.001

 1

66 (34.4%)

53.0%

6.21 (2.54–15.20)

 

 2–4

74 (38.5%)

50.0%

5.50 (2.28–13.27)

 ≥ 5

52 (27.1%)

15.4%

1

In a union

   

0.666

 Yes

49 (25.3%)

44.9%

1.15 (0.60–2.22)

 

 No

145 (74.7%)

41.4%

1

Heard of FP methods

   

< 0.001

 0–3

31 (15.9%)

80.7%

7.75 (3.00–20.00)

 

 4–8

163 84.0%)

35.0%

1

Slept under bednet

   

< 0.001

 Yes

123 (63.4%)

30.1%

1

 

 No

71 (36.6%)

63.4%

4.02 (2.17–7.46)

Hand wash < 4 h

   

< 0.001

 Yes

124 (63.9%)

26.6%

1

 

 No

70 (36.1%)

70.0%

6.43 (3.37–12.30)

  1. a= chi2 for trend; VPE = Volunteer Peer Educator; CAG = Community wellness Advocacy Group; FP = Family Planning
  2. *Improved water according to DHS definition