Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of confirmatory analysis of the ASABAs (n = 613), analysed with principal component analysis with direct oblique rotation, among secondary students in Kenya (n = 633), compared to the heterogeneous sample from Ghana and Zambia (n = 531)

From: Stigma related to contraceptive use and abortion in Kenya: scale development and validation

Question

Subscale 1

Subscale 2

Subscale 3

ASABA

SABA

ASABA

SABA

ASABA

SABA

1

.202a

.750

–

–

–

–

2

.448

.630

–

–

–

–

3

.669

.720

–

–

–

–

4

.680

.480

–

–

–

–

5

.539

.610

–

–

–

–

6

.452

.460

–

–

–

–

7

.628

.740

–

–

–

–

8

.631

.670

–

–

–

–

9

–

–

.467

.610

–

–

10

–

–

.560

.660

–

–

11

–

–

.663

.530

–

–

12

–

–

.601

.820

–

–

13

–

–

.646

.620

–

–

14

–

–

.676

.580

–

–

15

–

–

.553

.640

–

–

16

–

–

–

–

.600

.870

17

–

–

–

–

.656

.590

18

–

–

–

–

.740

.870

  1. aLoaded 0.9 in fourth component