Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariable multilevel regressions results for subscale and total scores and sample characteristics (QCC Mexico Survey)

From: Client, provider, and visit factors associated with quality in contraceptive counseling in Mexico: an exploratory cross-sectional analysis

Variables

Information Exchange Scorea

Interpersonal Relationship Scorea

Disrespect and Abuse Scorea

Total scorea

Coefficient (95% CI)

Coefficient (95% CI)

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)

Coefficient (95% CI)

Age (years)

 15–18

REF

REF

REF

REF

 19–24

− 0.153 (− 0.322 to 0.016)

− 0.045 (− 0.189 to 0.099)

2.495 (1.06 to 5.873)*

− 0.058 (− 0.178 to 0.063)

 25–34

− 0.146 (− 0.331 to 0.038)

− 0.037 (− 0.194 to 0.120)

4.526 (1.577 to 12.994)**

− 0.041 (− 0.173 to 0.091)

 35+

− 0.287 (− 0.496 to − 0.078)**

− 0.145 (− 0.323 to 0.033)

6.105 (1.647 to 22.631)**

− 0.147 (− 0.296 to 0.002)

LGBTTTIQ status

 Not LGBTTTIQ

REF

REF

REF

REF

 LGBTTTIQ

0.074 (− 0.102 to 0.250)

0.082 (− 0.069 to 0.233)

3.68 (0.792 to 17.095)

0.068 (− 0.058 to 0.195)

Relationship status

 Single

REF

REF

REF

REF

 In a relationship

− 0.019 (− 0.166 to 0.127)

0.015 (− 0.110 to 0.139)

0.836 (0.360 to 1.945)

− 0.017 (− 0.122 to 0.088)

 Married

0.066 (− 0.107 to 0.239)

0.007 (− 0.141 to 0.154)

0.899 (0.296 to 2.731)

0.012 (− 0.112 to 0.136)

 Divorced, widowed, or separated

− 0.176 (− 0.457 to 0.104)

− 0.167 (− 0.406 to 0.071)

0.236 (0.052 to 1.065)

− 0.176 (− 0.376 to 0.024)

Children

 None

REF

REF

REF

REF

 1+

0.210 (0.059 to 0.361)**

0.122 (− 0.006 to 0.251)

0.994 (0.405 to 2.439)

0.132 (0.024 to 0.24)*

Education

 Primary school or less

REF

REF

REF

REF

 Secondary school

0.079 (− 0.080 to 0.238)

0.006 (− 0.129 to 0.141)

0.443 (0.139 to 1.409)

0.032 (− 0.081 to 0.145)

 More than secondary school

0.066 (− 0.099 to 0.232)

− 0.062 (− 0.203 to 0.079)

0.687 (0.201 to 2.347)

0.004 (− 0.114 to 0.122)

Occupation

 Work for pay

REF

REF

REF

REF

 Work without pay

0.042 (− 0.092 to 0.177)

0.072 (− 0.042 to 0.187)

1.272 (0.537 to 3.012)

0.046 (− 0.050 to 0.142)

 Student

0.046 (− 0.141 to 0.234)

0.076 (− 0.084 to 0.235)

0.898 (0.294 to 2.742)

0.033 (− 0.101 to 0.167)

Provider gender

 Female

REF

REF

REF

REF

 Male

− 0.039 (− 0.161 to 0.083)

0.022 (− 0.083 to 0.127)

0.863 (0.421 to 1.770)

0.00 (− 0.088 to 0.088)

Provider type

 Doctor

REF

REF

REF

REF

 Nurse

0.014 (− 0.128 to 0.156)

0.000 (− 0.126 to 0.126)

1.682 (0.690 to 4.099)

0.032 (− 0.075 to 0.139)

 Social worker or other

− 0.051 (− 0.382 to 0.280)

− 0.051 (− 0.382 to 0.280)

3.420 (0.347 to 33.737)

− 0.063 (− 0.301 to 0.175)

Reason for visit

 Request contraceptive or ask for information

REF

REF

REF

REF

 Prenatal consult

− 0.118 (− 0.280 to 0.044)

− 0.042 (− 0.180 to 0.097)

0.596 (0.235 to 1.510)

− 0.069 (− 0.185 to 0.048)

 Remove method

0.081 (− 0.109 to 0.271)

0.03 (− 0.132 to 0.192)

1.476 (0.379 to 5.747)

0.053 (− 0.083 to 0.189)

 Method follow-up

0.113 (− 0.033 to 0.259)

0.05 (− 0.075 to 0.174)

1.185 (0.455 to 3.088)

0.066 (− 0.039 to 0.171)

 Post-partum

− 0.246 (− 0.444 to − 0.048)*

− 0.125 (− 0.297 to 0.046)

0.683 (0.227 to 2.061)

− 0.149 (− 0.294 to − 0.005)*

 Otherb

− 0.125 (− 0.297 to 0.047)

− 0.112 (− 0.260 to 0.036)

1.124 (0.362 to 3.496)

− 0.093 (− 0.217 to 0.031)

Intraclass correlation (ICC)

 Clinic as random effect ICC

0.029 (0.004 to 0.183)

0.049 (0.012 to 0.180)

0.056 (0.006 to 0.384)

0.056 (0.015 to 0.191)

 Null model ICC

0.024 (0.002 to 0.200)

0.043 (0.010 to 0.170)

0.078 (0.0167 to 0.299)

0.049 (0.012 to 0.180)

 Reduction in ICC from null

− 0.005

− 0.006

0.02

− 0.007

  1. Higher score represents higher quality (including Disrespect and Abuse subscale, where higher score indicates less disrespect). Sample size for each model was 470 complete cases
  2. bOther reasons for visit included preventative checkups, post-abortion care, and other specialty care
  3. *p-value < 0.05, **p-value < 0.01