Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary findings for the types identified, the findings of the studies and the overall range of prevalence

From: Women’s experiences throughout the birthing process in health facilities in Arab countries: a systematic review

WHO typology

Outcome of tnterest

Findings

Reported/calculated prevalence

Overall range of prevalence

Typology No. Six: “Poor rapport between women and providers”

 “Ineffective communication”

“Overall satisfaction of women with communication of midwives and physicians during labor and birth” [47]

58.4% of women were generally satisfied with communication of midwives and physicians during their labor and delivery

N = 1196

Reported prevalence is 58.4% of women were generally satisfied with communication of midwives and physicians during their labor and delivery

24.4% to 74.7% of women were satisfied with the communication throughout the birthing process

Satisfaction with health workers’ attitude [56]

Welcoming at admission prior to arrival to the ward (Yes 78.25%),

If the medical team identified himself to the patient (Yes 23.75%),

Badly handling of the patient "bad medical team behavior" (Yes 21.25%),

Courtesy, full attention and helpfulness of the medical team towards patients (Always 41.5%, usually 48.5%, sometimes 10%, never 0)

N = 400

Assume always and usually = Yes

Calculated prevalence is 67.7% of women were satisfied with health workers’ attitude

 

Satisfaction with health workers’ communication skills [56]

Explanation of the treatment plan for delivery to mothers (yes 61.25%),

Encouragement to ask about plan of treatment (yes 26.8%),

Encouragement to ask about discharge time (yes 11.25%),

Tell mothers about fasting before operation (yes 94.2%),

Give instruction of care before discharge (yes 92.5%)

N = 400

Calculated prevalence is 57.2% of women were satisfied with the health workers’ communication skills

 

“Mothers’ experience of care related to client-provider interaction” [57]

“The way doctor treated her” (Excellent/good 301, satisfactory 56, bad/very bad 78),

“The way nurse treated her” (Excellent/good 349, satisfactory 39, bad/very bad 47),

Privacy maintained (Yes 374 No 61),

“Provider listened to her questions” (Yes 224 No 31 didn't ask 180),

“Provider explained her health status” (Yes 310, No 125),

“Mother informed about baby's condition” (Yes 178 No 257)

N = 435

Assume excellent/ good = Yes

Calculated

prevalence is 66.5% of women having positive experience of care related to client provider interaction

 

Satisfaction with “interpersonal aspect of care” [57]

“Privacy maintained during care” (Total satisfied 88.7%),

“Encouragement at delivery” (Total satisfied 82%),

“The way doctor treated them” (Total satisfied 69.2%),

“The way nurses treated them” (Total satisfied 77.7%),

“The way workers treated them” (Total satisfied 56.1%)

N = 435

Calculated Prevalence is 74.7% of women were satisfied with interpersonal aspect of care

 

Dissatisfaction with intrapartum care [54]

X = 22.40; SD +—4.06; range 12–31

Findings indicated that the majority of women were not satisfied with intrapartum care

Prevalence 75.6% of women were dissatisfied with intrapartum care

N = 320

Calculated prevalence is 24.4% of women were satisfied with intrapartum care

 

Satisfaction with childbirth experience [55]

X = 111.6 SD + −15.5; range 57–153

Women were not satisfied with their childbirth experience

No prevalence

 
 

“Not talked to any health professional about how they felt about what happened during labor and birth” [54]

Numbers were not clear to calculate the prevalence

No prevalence

 

Women’s satisfaction [51]

X = 133.3; range 45–155

High level of satisfaction

No prevalence

 “Lack of supportive care”

“Presence of birth support persons” [53]

16% of women had birth support persons presented

Reported prevalence is 16% of women had birth support persons presented

4.14% to 16% of women had supportive care throughout the birthing process

“Presence of companion” [57]

4.14% of women has companion presented with them

N = 435

Reported prevalence is 4.14% of women has companion presented with them

Women’s satisfaction [51]

X = 133.3; range 45–155

High level of satisfaction

No prevalence

 

 “Loss of autonomy”

“Women’s authority during childbirth” [53]

36% of women had authority during childbirth in institutions

N = 69

Reported prevalence is 36% of women had authority during childbirth

35% to 36% of women had autonomy throughout the birthing process

*These two studies measured the same outcome within the same study methodological characteristics, but resulted with different numbers, and since it was not possible to decide on which number to consider, both prevalence were considered for the analysis

 

“Women’s perceived authority at birth” [52]

35% perceived own authority during childbirth in institutions

N = 68

Reported prevalence is 35% of women perceived own authority during childbirth in institutions

 

Women’s satisfaction [51]

X = 133.3; range 45–155

High level of satisfaction

No prevalence

 
 

“Women’s perception of control” [51]

X = 44.9; range 10–70

Average level of perceived control in labor

No prevalence

 

“Perceived control during childbirth experience” [55]

X = 81.8 SD + −9.4; range 58–107

Women perceived that they had little control over their childbirth experience

No prevalence

 

Satisfaction with childbirth experience [55]

X = 111.6 SD + −15.5; range 57–153

Women were not satisfied with their childbirth experience

No prevalence

 

“Own choice of birth attendance” [53]

72.5% of women had their own choice of birth attendance/location (there is no prevalence for own choice of birth attendance only) N = 69

No prevalence

Typology No. Seven: “Health system conditions and constraints”

 Lack of resources”

Privacy sensation during hospital stay [56]

42.7% were least satisfied with privacy sensation during hospital stay

N = 400

Reported prevalence is 57.3% of women were satisfied with privacy sensation during hospital stay

55.5% to 89% of women were satisfied with the resources throughout the birthing process

 

Maternal satisfaction related to facilities available in hospital [56]

•Breadth of the patient's or labor wardroom (Excellent 21.5%, very good 45%, good 0, suitable 33.5%, poor 0),

Quietness in the patient's room (Excellent 0, very good 41.5%, good 55.5%, suitable 3%, poor 0),

Cleanliness of the patient's room (Excellent 0, very good 31.25%, good 58%, suitable 10.75%, poor 0),

Hand hygiene of the medical team (Excellent 0, very good 28.75%, good 50.75%, suitable 20.5%, poor 0),

Bathroom facilities and cleanliness (Excellent 3.2%, very good 0, good 57%, suitable 39.8%, poor 0),

Quality of food (No food 7%, excellent 0, very good 6.5%, good 38.25%, suitable 48.25%, poor 0)

N = 400

Assume excellent, very good and good = Yes

Calculated prevalence is 72.8% of women were satisfied regarding facilities available in hospital

 

Satisfaction with “technical aspect of care” [57]

“Availability of medical facilities” (Total satisfied 62.9%),

“Competency of care provider” (Total satisfied 92%),

Health advice (Total satisfied 11.7%)

N = 435

Calculated prevalence is 55.5% of women were satisfied with technical aspect of care

 

“Satisfaction with physical environment” [57]

Cleanliness (Total satisfied 93.6%),

Availability of beds (Total satisfied 95.2%),

Sanitary facilities (Total satisfied 78.2%)

N = 435

Calculated prevalence is 89% of women were satisfied with physical environment

 

Satisfaction with “outcome of care” [57]

“Health condition of mothers” (Total satisfied 86.4%),

“Health condition of the newborn” (Total satisfied 90.3%)

N = 435

Calculated prevalence is 88.4% of women were satisfied with outcome of care

 

Postpartum care [50]

81.7% in 2005 and 89.8% in 2008 of women received postpartum care after delivery in the hospital

N = 9845 in 2005 and N = 7896 in 2008

Reported prevalence is 85.75% of women received postpartum care after delivery in the hospital

 

“Mothers’ overall satisfaction with delivery care” [57]

63% of women were satisfied with the quality of delivery care they received at the hospital

N = 435

Reported prevalence is 63% of women were satisfied with the quality of delivery care they received at the hospital

 

“General satisfaction with care during labor” [47]

78% of women were generally satisfied with care during labor

N = 1196

Reported prevalence is 78% of women were generally satisfied with care during labor

 

Women’s satisfaction with intrapartum care [48]

Most women (98.7%) reported that they were satisfied with the care they received, but without distinguishing between women who gave birth in a health facility (78.8%) and women who gave birth at home (20.4%)

No prevalence

 
 

Satisfaction with childbirth experience [55]

X = 111.6 SD + −15.5; range 57–153

Women were not satisfied with their childbirth experience

No prevalence

 

Attendance of anyone that they didn’t want to be there [54]

Numbers were not clear to calculate the prevalence

No prevalence

 

Women’s satisfaction [51]

X = 133.3; range 45–155

High level of satisfaction

No prevalence

 “Lack of policies”

Mother-infant proximity [53]

“Skin-to-skin” (0),

“Wrapped/dressed in arms” (15%, 10/66),

“Separate bed/elsewhere near” (39.4%, 26/66),

“Other place in room but out of contact” (36.4%, 24/66),

“Separate room/place out of sight” (9%, 6/66)

N = 66

Assume “skin-to-skin”, “wrapped/ dressed in arms”, “separate bed/ elsewhere near” = Yes

Calculated prevalence is

54.4% of women had close contact with their newborn after delivery

54.4% to 78.5% of women were satisfied with the policies throughout the birthing process

 

Satisfaction with the admission process [56]

73.5% were satisfied with the admission process

N = 400

Reported prevalence is 73.5% of women were satisfied with the admission process

 

General assessment of the childbirth process [56]

Excellent 0, very good 23%, good 55.5%, suitable 16.25%, poor 5.25%

N = 400

Assume excellent, very good and good = Yes

Calculated prevalence is 78.5% of women were satisfied with the childbirth process

 

Satisfaction with childbirth experience [55]

X = 111.6 SD + −15.5; range 57–153

Women were not satisfied with their childbirth experience

No prevalence

 
 

Women’s satisfaction [51]

X = 133.3; range 45–155

High level of satisfaction

No prevalence

Typology No. Five: “Failure to meet professional standards”

 Physical examinations and procedures

Satisfaction with childbirth experience [55]

X = 111.6 SD + −15.5; range 57–153

Women were not satisfied with their childbirth experience

No prevalence